共 50 条
Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews
被引:72
|作者:
Shaffer, Kelly M.
[1
]
Turner, Kea L.
[2
]
Siwik, Chelsea
[3
]
Gonzalez, Brian
[2
]
Upasani, Rujula
[1
]
Glazer, Jillian, V
[1
]
Ferguson, Robert J.
[4
]
Joshua, Catherine
[1
]
Low, Carissa A.
[4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Virginia, Ctr Behav Hlth & Technol, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Behav, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Osher Ctr Integrat Hlth, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Hematol Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源:
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH
|
2023年
/
5卷
/
05期
关键词:
WEB-BASED INTERVENTIONS;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY;
PEDIATRIC CANCER;
VIRTUAL-REALITY;
MHEALTH INTERVENTIONS;
SURVIVORSHIP CARE;
SKIN-CANCER;
TECHNOLOGY;
OUTCOMES;
D O I:
10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00049-3
中图分类号:
R-058 [];
学科分类号:
摘要:
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote cancer care delivery via the internet and telephone, rapidly accelerating an already growing care delivery model and associated research. This scoping review of reviews characterised the peer-reviewed literature reviews on digital health and telehealth interventions in cancer published from database Cochrane Reviews, and Web of Science. Eligible reviews conducted a systematic literature search. Data were extracted in duplicate via a pre-defined online survey. Following screening, 134 reviews met the eligibility criteria. 77 of those reviews were published since 2020. 128 reviews summarised interventions intended for patients, 18 addressed family caregivers, and five addressed health-care providers. 56 reviews did not target a specific phase of the cancer continuum, whereas 48 reviews tended to address the active treatment phase. 29 reviews included a meta-analysis, with results showing positive effects on quality of life, psychological outcomes, and screening behaviours. 83 reviews did not report intervention implementation outcomes but when reported, 36 reported acceptability, 32 feasibility, and 29 fidelity outcomes. Several notable gaps were identified in these literature reviews on digital health and telehealth in cancer care. No reviews specifically addressed older adults, bereavement, or sustainability of interventions and only two reviews focused on comparing telehealth to in-person interventions. Addressing these gaps with rigorous systematic reviews might help guide continued innovation in remote cancer care, particularly for older adults and bereaved families, and integrate and sustain these interventions within oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:E316 / E327
页数:12
相关论文