Surgical repair of large segmental bone loss with the induced membrane technique: patient reported outcomes are comparable to nonunions without bone loss

被引:1
|
作者
Konda, Sanjit R. R. [1 ,2 ]
Boadi, Blake I. I. [1 ]
Leucht, Philipp [1 ]
Ganta, Abhishek [1 ,2 ]
Egol, Kenneth A. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, NYU Langone Orthoped Hosp, 301 E 17Th St,Suite 1402, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Jama Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY 11418 USA
关键词
Segmental bone loss; Nonunion; Induced membrane technique; SMFA; VAS; RECONSTRUCTION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-023-03580-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of patients with segmental bone loss who underwent repair with the induced membrane technique (IMT) with a matched cohort of nonunion fractures without bone loss.DesignRetrospective analysis on prospectively collected data.SettingAcademic medical center.PatientsTwo cohorts of patients, those with upper and lower extremity diaphyseal large segmental bone loss and those with ununited fractures, were enrolled prospectively between 2013 and 2020. Sixteen patients who underwent repair of 17 extremities with segmental diaphyseal or meta-diaphyseal bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique were identified, and matched with 17 patients who were treated for 17 fracture nonunions treated without an induced membrane. Sixteen of the bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique were due to acute bone loss, and the other was a chronic aseptic nonunion.Main Outcome MeasurementsHealing rate, time to union, functional outcome scores using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) and pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).ResultsThe initial average defect size for patients treated with the induced membrane technique was 8.85 cm. Mean follow-up times were similar with 17.06 & PLUSMN; 10.13 months for patients treated with the IMT, and 20.35 & PLUSMN; 16.68. months for patients treated without the technique. Complete union was achieved in 15/17 (88.2%) of segmental bone loss cases treated with the IMT and 17/17 (100%) of cases repaired without the technique at the latest follow up visit. The average time to union for patients treated with the induced membrane technique was 13.0 & PLUSMN; 8.4 months and 9.64 & PLUSMN; 4.7 months for the matched cohort. There were no significant differences in reported outcomes measured by the SMFA or VAS. Patients treated with the induced membrane technique required more revision surgeries than those not treated with an induced membrane.ConclusionOutcomes following treatment of acute bone loss from the diaphysis of long bones with the induced membrane technique produces clinical and radiographic outcomes similar to those of long bone fracture nonunions without bone loss that go on to heal.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Induced membrane technique using beta-tricalcium phosphate for reconstruction of femoral and tibial segmental bone loss due to infection: technical tips and preliminary clinical results
    Gen Sasaki
    Yoshinobu Watanabe
    Wataru Miyamoto
    Youichi Yasui
    Shota Morimoto
    Hirotaka Kawano
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 17 - 24
  • [32] Antibiotic Cement Spacer and Induced Membrane Bone Grafting in Open Distal End Femur Fractures with Bone Loss; Radiographic and Functional Outcomes: A Retrospective Study
    Patel, Dharmesh
    Singh, Avtar
    Vohra, Rajeev
    Chauhan, Sandeep
    Thorat, Babaji
    TRAUMA MONTHLY, 2021, 26 (04) : 213 - 221
  • [33] Staged bone grafting for the management of segmental long bone defects caused by trauma or infection using induced-membrane technique
    El-Hadidi, Talaat Taher
    Soliman, Hesham Mesbah
    Farouk, Hazem Ahmed
    Radwan, Mustafa Abd El-Mogeeb
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2018, 84 (04): : 384 - 396
  • [34] Restoration of long bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique: protocol and outcomes
    Giannoudis, Peter V.
    Harwood, Paul J.
    Tosounidis, Theodoros
    Kanakaris, Nikolaos K.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 : S53 - S61
  • [35] Managing large bone defects in children: a systematic review of the 'induced membrane technique'
    Morelli, Ilaria
    Drago, Lorenzo
    George, David A.
    Romano, Delia
    Romano, Carlo L.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2018, 27 (05): : 443 - 455
  • [36] The Masquelet technique combined with the muscle flap for use in emergency management of acute Gustilo type III trauma of the lower limb with segmental bone loss:Case series
    Deng, Linglong
    Yu, Aixi
    Qi, Baiwen
    Lei, Jun
    De Souza, Cristabelle
    Zhu, Shaobo
    Yu, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 81 : 85 - 93
  • [37] Arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation: an alternative technique treating anterior shoulder instability with bone loss
    Maiotti, Marco
    Russo, Raffaele
    Zanini, Antonio
    Schroter, Steffen
    Massoni, Carlo
    Bianchedi, Diana
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (06) : 898 - 906
  • [38] Combined Technique for the Treatment of Infected Nonunions of the Distal Femur With Bone Loss: Short Supracondylar Nail-Augmented Acute Shortening/Lengthening
    Sen, Cengiz
    Akgul, Turgut
    Tetsworth, Kevin D.
    Balci, Halil Ibrahim
    Yildiz, Fatih
    Necmettin, Turgut
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2020, 34 (09) : 476 - 481
  • [39] Induced membrane technique for large bone defects A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
    Sun, Shih-Heng
    Tsai, Wen-Wen
    Shiu, Sz-Iuan
    Chen, Chih-Hui
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (25)
  • [40] Induced membrane technique for the treatment of severe acute tibial bone loss: preliminary experience at medium-term follow-up
    Ronga, Mario
    Cherubino, Mario
    Corona, Katia
    Fagetti, Alessandro
    Bertani, Barbara
    Valdatta, Luigi
    Mora, Redento
    Cherubino, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (01) : 209 - 215