Improved Prediction of Surgical-Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery Using Machine Learning

被引:16
作者
Chen, Kevin A. [1 ]
Joisa, Chinmaya U. [2 ]
Stem, Jonathan M. [1 ]
Guillem, Jose G. [1 ]
Gomez, Shawn M. [2 ]
Kapadia, Muneera R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Joint Dept Biomed Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, 100 Manning Dr,Burnett Womack Bldg,Suite 4038, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Colorectal surgery; Machine learning; Surgical-site infection; RISK CALCULATOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000002559
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infection is a source of significant morbidity after colorectal surgery. Previous efforts to develop models that predict surgical-site infection have had limited accuracy. Machine learning has shown promise in predicting postoperative outcomes by identifying nonlinear patterns within large data sets.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to seek usage of machine learning to develop a more accurate predictive model for colorectal surgical-site infections.DESIGN: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database from years 2012 to 2019 and were split into training, validation, and test sets. Machine-learning techniques included random forest, gradient boosting, and artificial neural network. A logistic regression model was also created. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.SETTINGS: A national, multicenter data set.PATIENTS: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome (surgical-site infection) included patients who experienced superficial, deep, or organ-space surgical-site infections.RESULTS: The data set included 275,152 patients after the application of exclusion criteria. Of all patients, 10.7% experienced a surgical-site infection. Artificial neural network showed the best performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.769 (95% CI, 0.762-0.777), compared with 0.766 (95% CI, 0.759-0.774) for gradient boosting, 0.764 (95% CI, 0.756-0.772) for random forest, and 0.677 (95% CI, 0.669-0.685) for logistic regression. For the artificial neural network model, the strongest predictors of surgical-site infection were organ-space surgical-site infection present at time of surgery, operative time, oral antibiotic bowel preparation, and surgical approach.LIMITATIONS: Local institutional validation was not performed.CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning techniques predict colorectal surgical-site infections with higher accuracy than logistic regression. These techniques may be used to identify patients at increased risk and to target preventive interventions for surgical-site infection.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 466
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Applying the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator to patients undergoing colorectal surgery: theory vs reality [J].
Adegboyega, Titilayo O. ;
Borgert, Andrew J. ;
Lambert, Pamela J. ;
Jarman, Benjamin T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 213 (01) :30-35
[2]  
American College of Surgeons, ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File. Data and Registries-ACS NSQIP
[3]   Failure of Colorectal Surgical Site Infection Predictive Models Applied to an Independent Dataset: Do They Add Value or Just Confusion? [J].
Bergquist, John R. ;
Thiels, Cornelius A. ;
Etzioni, David A. ;
Habermann, Elizabeth B. ;
Cima, Robert R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 222 (04) :431-438
[4]   Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Dunn, Jack ;
Velmahos, George C. ;
Kaafarani, Haytham M. A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (04) :574-583
[5]   MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death After Surgery [J].
Bihorac, Azra ;
Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Tezcan ;
Ebadi, Ashkan ;
Motaei, Amir ;
Madkour, Mohcine ;
Pardalos, Panagote M. ;
Lipori, Gloria ;
Hogan, William R. ;
Efron, Philip A. ;
Moore, Frederick ;
Moldawer, Lyle L. ;
Wang, Daisy Zhe ;
Hobson, Charles E. ;
Rashidi, Parisi ;
Li, Xiaolin ;
Momcilovic, Petar .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (04) :652-662
[6]   Development and Evaluation of the Universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: A Decision Aid and Informed Consent Tool for Patients and Surgeons [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Liu, Yaoming ;
Paruch, Jennifer L. ;
Zhou, Lynn ;
Kmiecik, Thomas E. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Cohen, Mark E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (05) :833-+
[7]   Assessing the utility of deep neural networks in predicting postoperative surgical complications: a retrospective study [J].
Bonde, Alexander ;
Varadarajan, Kartik M. ;
Bonde, Nicholas ;
Troelsen, Anders ;
Muratoglu, Orhun K. ;
Malchau, Henrik ;
Yang, Anthony D. ;
Alam, Hasan ;
Sillesen, Martin .
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2021, 3 (08) :E471-E485
[8]   Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Significantly Reduces Surgical Site Infection in Open Colorectal Surgery [J].
Bonds, Allison M. ;
Novick, Tessa K. ;
Dietert, Jessica B. ;
Araghizadeh, Farshid Y. ;
Olson, Craig H. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (12) :1403-1408
[9]   Artificial Intelligence-Based Multimodal Risk Assessment Model for Surgical Site Infection (AMRAMS): Development and Validation Study [J].
Chen, Weijia ;
Lu, Zhijun ;
You, Lijue ;
Zhou, Lingling ;
Xu, Jie ;
Chen, Ken .
JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 8 (06)
[10]  
Chollet F., 2015, Keras