Momentum-Based Distributed Continuous-Time Nonconvex Optimization of Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems via Timescale Separation

被引:19
作者
Jin, Zhenghong [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Choon Ki [3 ]
Li, Jiawen [4 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, State Key Lab Synthet Automat Proc Ind, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[3] Korea Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Seoul 136701, South Korea
[4] Shenyang Univ Technol, Sch Sci, Shenyang 110870, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING | 2023年 / 10卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Optimization; Multi-agent systems; Linear programming; Perturbation methods; Steady-state; Closed loop systems; Vehicle dynamics; Distributed optimization; gradient flows; nonlinear multi-agent systems; singular perturbation approach; CONVEX-OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMAL CONSENSUS; COORDINATION; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1109/TNSE.2022.3225409
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study addresses the distributed nonconvex optimization problem for nonlinear multi-agent systems over a weight-balanced and quasi-strongly connected graph. The purpose is to steer all agents to the optimum of a given global objective function with inputs and outputs on the basis of the actual partial information related to the input and output. Novel momentum-based distributed optimal coordinators are designed to achieve this objective, and the local objective functions should be analytic to replace its convexity. An interconnected system with different timescales is established by converting the overall closed-loop system involving the module of momentum-based distributed optimal coordinators and nonlinear multi-agent systems. The singular perturbation approach is applied to deal with the overall interconnected closed-loop system by timescale separation. A numerical example and an application example with four firefighting unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) verify the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed distributed method and extended algorithms. Three momentum-based gradient descent algorithms (basic momentum-based, momentum-based Newton, and projected momentum-based gradient flows) are compared and analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 989
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   On the stable equilibrium points of gradient systems [J].
Absil, P-A. ;
Kurdyka, K. .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 2006, 55 (07) :573-577
[2]   PROJECTED NEWTON METHODS AND OPTIMIZATION OF MULTICOMMODITY FLOWS [J].
BERTSEKAS, DP ;
GAFNI, EM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1983, 28 (12) :1090-1096
[3]   Distributed Reactive Power Feedback Control for Voltage Regulation and Loss Minimization [J].
Bolognani, Saverio ;
Carli, Ruggero ;
Cavraro, Guido ;
Zampieri, Sandro .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2015, 60 (04) :966-981
[4]   Distributed Generator Coordination for Initialization and Anytime Optimization in Economic Dispatch [J].
Cherukuri, Ashish ;
Cortes, Jorge .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, 2015, 2 (03) :226-237
[5]   Singular perturbations and input-to-state stability [J].
Christofides, PD ;
Teel, AR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1996, 41 (11) :1645-1650
[6]   Coordination and geometric optimization via distributed dynamical systems [J].
Cortés, J ;
Bullo, F .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 44 (05) :1543-1574
[7]   An Online Gradient Algorithm for Optimal Power Flow on Radial Networks [J].
Gan, Lingwen ;
Low, Steven H. .
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 34 (03) :625-638
[8]   Output-feedback adaptive optimal control of interconnected systems based on robust adaptive dynamic programming [J].
Gao, Weinan ;
Jiang, Yu ;
Jiang, Zhong-Ping ;
Chai, Tianyou .
AUTOMATICA, 2016, 72 :37-45
[9]   Distributed Continuous-Time Convex Optimization on Weight-Balanced Digraphs [J].
Gharesifard, Bahman ;
Cortes, Jorge .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2014, 59 (03) :781-786
[10]   Inexact variable metric method for convex-constrained optimization problems [J].
Goncalves, Douglas S. ;
Goncalves, Max L. N. ;
Menezes, Tiago C. .
OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 71 (01) :145-163