Prognostic Impact of Surgical Margin Width in Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

被引:4
作者
Sakamoto, Katsunori [1 ]
Beppu, Toru [2 ]
Ogawa, Kohei [1 ]
Tamura, Kei [1 ]
Honjo, Masahiko [1 ]
Funamizu, Naotake [1 ]
Takada, Yasutsugu [1 ]
机构
[1] Ehime Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Hepato Biliary Pancreat & Breast Surg, Toon, Ehime, Japan
[2] Yamaga City Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Kumamoto, Japan
关键词
Surgical margin; Colorectal liver metastasis; Chemotherapy; HEPATIC RESECTION; R1; RESECTION; MAJOR HEPATECTOMY; SURVIVAL; RECURRENCE; CANCER; SURGERY; ERA; CARCINOMA; APPRAISAL;
D O I
10.14218/JCTH.2022.00383
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
As for resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), securing an adequate surgical margin is important for achieving a better prognosis. However, it is often difficult to achieve adequate margins for the resection of CRLM. So the current survival impact of sub-centi/millimeter surgical margins in hepatectomy for CRLM should be evaluated. In the current era of multidisciplinary treatment options, this review focused on the prognostic impact of a sub-centi/millimeter surgical margin width in hepatectomy for CRLM. We systematically reviewed retrospective studies that clearly described the surgical margin width for hepatectomy for CRLM. We selected studies conducted since 2000 that involved patients diagnosed as having CRLM. We focused on studies that investigated not only surgical margins, but also microscopic surgical curability such as R0 (microscopically complete resection) or R1 (microscopically incomplete resection), which clearly describe their definitions. Based on our literature review, 1, 2, or 5 mm was considered the minimum surgical margin width for hepatectomy for CRLM. Although a surgical margin width of 1 mm is acceptable for hepatectomy for CRLM, submillimeter margins, which are defined as R1 in many reports, are only acceptable for limited patients such as those who have undergone preoperative chemotherapy. Zero-mm margins are also acceptable in limited patients such as those who show a good response to preoperative chemotherapy. New chemotherapy agents have been reported to reduce the prognostic impact of a narrow surgical margin width. The incidence of margin recurrence, which is a major concern regarding R1 resection of CRLM, is about 20-30% according to the majority of earlier reports. As evaluations of the actual prognostic impact of the surgical margin remain difficult, further study is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 717
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Two-stage hepatectomy: A planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors
    Adam, R
    Laurent, A
    Azoulay, D
    Castaing, D
    Bismuth, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (06) : 777 - 784
  • [2] Margin Status Remains an Important Determinant of Survival After Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Chemotherapy
    Andreou, Andreas
    Aloia, Thomas A.
    Brouquet, Antoine
    Dickson, Paxton V.
    Zimmitti, Giuseppe
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Kopetz, Scott
    Loyer, Evelyne M.
    Curley, Steven A.
    Abdalla, Eddie K.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (06) : 1079 - 1088
  • [3] Surgery for colorectal liver metastases: the impact of resection margins on recurrence and overall survival
    Angelsen, Jon-Helge
    Horn, Arild
    Eide, Geir Egil
    Viste, Asgaut
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
  • [4] The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis
    Are, Chandrakanth
    Gonen, Mithat
    Zazzali, Kathleen
    DeMatteo, Ronald P.
    Jarnagin, William R.
    Fong, Yuman
    Blumgart, Leslie H.
    D'Angelica, Miehael
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (02) : 295 - 300
  • [5] Impact of microscopic incomplete resection for colorectal liver metastases on surgical margin recurrence: R1-Contact vs R1 < 1 mm margin width
    Ausania, Fabio
    Landi, Filippo
    Martinez-Perez, Aleix
    Sandomenico, Raffaele
    Cuatrecasas, Miriam
    Pages, Mario
    Maurel, Joan
    Garcia, Rocio
    Fuster, Josep
    Carlos Garcia-Valdecasas, Juan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (04) : 449 - 459
  • [6] Outcome of Microscopic Incomplete Resection (R1) of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Ayez, Ninos
    Lalmahomed, Zarina S.
    Eggermont, Alexander M. M.
    Ijzermans, Jan N. M.
    de Jonge, Jeroen
    van Montfort, Kees
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 1618 - 1627
  • [7] Size of surgical margin does not influence recurrence rates after curative liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases
    Bodingbauer, M.
    Tamandl, D.
    Schmid, K.
    Plank, C.
    Schimai, W.
    Gruenberger, T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (09) : 1133 - 1138
  • [8] RAS Mutation Predicts Positive Resection Margins and Narrower Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Brudvik, Kristoffer Watten
    Mise, Yoshihiro
    Chung, Michael Hsiang
    Chun, Yun Shin
    Kopetz, Scott E.
    Passot, Guillaume
    Conrad, Claudius
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Aloia, Thomas A.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (08) : 2635 - 2643
  • [9] Impact of subcentimeter margin on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases: A meta-regression approach
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    Cescon, Matteo
    Bigonzi, Eleonora
    Peri, Eugenia
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Pinna, Antonio D.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2012, 151 (05) : 691 - 699
  • [10] R1 Resection by Necessity for Colorectal Liver Metastases Is It Still a Contraindication to Surgery? Discussions
    Choti, Michael A.
    Blumgart, Leslie H.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Clary, Bryan M.
    Adam, Rene
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (04) : 636 - 637