Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks

被引:10
作者
Cicchino, Jessica B. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Insurance Inst Highway Safety, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
关键词
Light truck vehicles; autonomous emergency braking; AEB; FCW; front crash prevention; crash avoidance technology; VEHICLE INCOMPATIBILITY; RISK; FATALITY; SYSTEMS; CARS; INJURY;
D O I
10.1080/15389588.2023.2176191
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectiveForward collision warning (FCW) and automatic emergency braking (AEB) have found to be effective on cars, SUVs, and large trucks. The objective of this study was to extend prior work and estimate the effects of FCW and AEB on pickups.MethodsRear-end crashes where a pickup with optional FCW or AEB was the striking vehicle were identified in 25 U.S. states during 2017-2020. Quasi-induced exposure was performed with logistic regression to compare rear-end-striking crashes between vehicles with and without the systems relative to being struck in the rear. Rear-end-striking crash rates per registered vehicle year were also compared between equipped and non-equipped pickups with Poisson regression. The association of the systems with severity in the rear-end-striking crashes that occurred was examined with logistic regression.ResultsIn the quasi-induced exposure analysis, AEB was associated with statistically significant 34% reductions in the risk of a rear-end-striking crash of any severity and with any injuries, and a 76% reduction in the risk of a rear-end-striking crash with serious or fatal injuries (p = 0.09). FCW was associated with statistically significant declines of 22% in the risk of a rear-end-striking crash with any injuries and 71% in the risk of a rear-end-striking crash with serious or fatal injuries, but FCW was not associated with a change in all rear-end-striking crashes. Results were similar in Poisson regression models for all but FCW's effect on all rear-end-striking crashes. The odds that rear-end-striking crashes involving pickups with FCW resulted in any injuries were 26% lower, and serious/fatal injuries were 75% lower, than those involving pickups without the system. AEB was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the odds of serious/fatal injuries when a rear-end strike occurred and no change in the odds of any injuries.DiscussionConsistent benefits for front crash prevention systems have been demonstrated for a wide range of vehicle types, now including a sample of pickups. Gaps in proposed U.S. regulations should be filled so that AEB is required equipment on all new vehicles.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Cicchino J. B., 2018, Real-world effects of general motors forward collision alert and front automatic braking systems
[2]   Effects of automatic emergency braking systems on pedestrian crash risk [J].
Cicchino, Jessica B. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 172
[3]   Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking [J].
Cicchino, Jessica B. ;
Zuby, David S. .
TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2019, 20 :S112-S118
[4]   Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates [J].
Cicchino, Jessica B. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2017, 99 :142-152
[5]   Effect of population density on mortality after motor vehicle collisions [J].
Clark, DE .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2003, 35 (06) :965-971
[6]   Do Light Truck Vehicles (LTV) Impose Greater Risk of Pedestrian Injury Than Passenger Cars? A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review [J].
Desapriya, E. ;
Subzwari, S. ;
Sasges, D. ;
Basic, A. ;
Alidina, A. ;
Turcotte, K. ;
Pike, I. .
TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2010, 11 (01) :48-56
[7]   Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes [J].
Fildes, B. ;
Keall, M. ;
Bos, N. ;
Lie, A. ;
Page, Y. ;
Pastor, C. ;
Pennisi, L. ;
Rizzi, M. ;
Thomas, P. ;
Tingvall, C. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2015, 81 :24-29
[8]   Forward collision warning system impact [J].
Hubele, Norma ;
Kennedy, Kathryn .
TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2018, 19 :S78-S83
[9]   Selection of Comparison Crash Types for Quasi-Induced Exposure Risk Estimation [J].
Keall, Michael ;
Newstead, Stuart .
TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2009, 10 (01) :23-29
[10]  
Krafft M., 2009, P 21 ENHANCED SAFETY