Early Toxicity and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcomes in Patients Treated With Adjuvant Proton-Based Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery

被引:1
作者
Sayan, Mutlay [1 ,5 ]
Kilic, Sarah [2 ]
Zhang, Yin [3 ]
Liu, Bo [3 ]
Jan, Imraan [3 ]
George, Mridula [4 ]
Kumar, Shicha [4 ]
Haffty, Bruce [3 ]
Ohri, Nisha [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Taussig Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Surg, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Med Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, 75 Francis St ASB1-L2, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Cosmesis; Dermatitis; Fatigue; Proton radiation; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CANCER; TRIAL; IRRADIATION; WOMEN; BOOST; MORBIDITY; SCHEDULE; COSMESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clbc.2022.11.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cosmesis after proton-based adjuvant breast radiotherapy is not well-characterized. We retrospectively reviewed cosmetic outcomes of patients treated with adjuvant proton-based breast radiotherapy. Acute toxicities and cosmetic outcomes were good to excellent as reported by both physicians and patients. Introduction: To evaluate the dosimetric data, early toxicity, and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant proton-based radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify breast cancer patients treated with breast-conser ving surger y followed by proton-based RT from 2015 to 2020. Patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were graded as excellent, good, fair, or poor. Early toxicity outcomes were graded by the treating physician during treatment. Dose-volume histograms were reviewed to obtain dosimetry data. Results: We identified 21 patients treated with adjuvant proton-based RT. Median whole breast dose delivered was 46.8 Gy (range, 40.0-50.4 Gy). Target volumes included the regional lymph nodes in 17 patients (81%). Seventeen patients (81%) received a lumpectomy boost. The median planning target volume V95 was 94% (range, 77%-100%), V100 71% (range, 60%-97%), V110 2% (range 0%-18%), and median max point dose was 115% (range, 105%-120%). The median ipsilateral breast V105 was 367.3 cc (range, 0-1172 cc) and V110 was 24.1 cc (range, 0-321.3 cc). Grade 2 and 3 dermatitis occurred in 62% and 14% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 pain was reported by 33% and 10% of patients, respectively. Median follow-up at the time of cosmetic evaluation was 27 months (range, 5-42 months). Four patients (21%) reported fair cosmetic outcome and 15 patients (79%) reported good or excellent cosmetic outcome. No poor cosmesis was reported. Conclusion: Adjuvant proton-based radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery is well tolerated with acceptable rates of acute toxicities and a high rate of good-to-excellent patient-reported cosmetic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 180
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Cosmetic assessment of breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer
    Al-Ghazal, SK
    Blamey, RW
    [J]. BREAST, 1999, 8 (04) : 162 - 168
  • [2] AMICHETTI M, 1995, ONCOLOGY, V52, P177
  • [3] Initial Report of a Prospective Dosimetric and Clinical Feasibility Trial Demonstrates the Potential of Protons to Increase the Therapeutic Ratio in Breast Cancer Compared With Photons
    Bradley, Julie A.
    Dagan, Roi
    Ho, Meng Wei
    Rutenberg, Michael
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Li, Zuofeng
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 411 - 421
  • [4] Bush DA, 2014, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V90, P501, DOI [10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.130, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.1308]
  • [5] Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment
    Cardoso, Maria J.
    Cardoso, Jaime
    Santos, Ana C.
    Vrieling, Conny
    Christie, David
    Liljegren, Goeran
    Azevedo, Isabel
    Johansen, Jorgen
    Rosa, Jose
    Amaral, Natalia
    Saaristo, Rauni
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Barros, Henrique
    Oliveira, Manuel C.
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [6] Toxicity and cosmetic outcome of hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy: predictive clinical and dosimetric factors
    Ciammella, Patrizia
    Podgornii, Ala
    Galeandro, Maria
    Micera, Renato
    Ramundo, Dafne
    Palmieri, Tamara
    Cagni, Elisabetta
    Iotti, Cinzia
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [7] Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised
    Cochrane, RA
    Valasiadou, P
    Wilson, ARM
    Al-Ghazal, SK
    Macmillan, RD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (12) : 1505 - 1509
  • [8] Long-term Cosmetic Outcomes and Toxicities of Proton Beam Therapy Compared With Photon-Based 3-Dimensional Conformal Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: A Phase 1 Trial
    Galland-Girodet, Sigolene
    Pashtan, Itai
    MacDonald, Shannon M.
    Ancukiewicz, Marek
    Hirsch, Ariel E.
    Kachnic, Lisa A.
    Specht, Michelle
    Gadd, Michele
    Smith, Barbara L.
    Powell, Simon N.
    Recht, Abram
    Taghian, Alphonse G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 (03): : 493 - 500
  • [9] BREAST APPEARANCE AND FUNCTION AFTER BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY AND RADIOTHERAPY
    HAMILTON, CS
    NIELD, JM
    ADLER, GF
    CLINGAN, PR
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1990, 29 (03) : 291 - 295
  • [10] RADIOTHERAPY BREAST BOOST WITH REDUCED WHOLE-BREAST DOSE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED COSMESIS: THE RESULTS OF A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT FROM THE ST. GEORGE AND WOLLONGONG RANDOMIZED BREAST BOOST TRIAL
    Hau, Eric
    Browne, Lois H.
    Khanna, Sam
    Cail, Stacy
    Cert, Grad
    Chin, Yaw
    Clark, Catherine
    Inder, Stephanie
    Szwajcer, Alison
    Graham, Peter H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 682 - 689