Contralateral breast radiation doses in breast cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy

被引:2
作者
Oymak, Ezgi [1 ]
Bozca, Recep [2 ]
Guler, Ozan Cem [2 ]
Onal, Cem [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Iskenderun Gelisim Hosp, Div Radiat Oncol, Antakya, Turkiye
[2] Baskent Univ, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Res & Treatment Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Adana, Turkiye
[3] Baskent Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Baskent Univ, Fac Med, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Res & Treatment Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Adana Dr, TR-01120 Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; Contralateral breast; Dosimetry; Helical tomotherapy; IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY; SECONDARY-CANCER; THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; RISK; SURVIVAL; PHOTON; BEAMS; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2022.11.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to evaluate contralateral breast doses calculated with a Treatment Planning System (TPS) and verified with metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors in patients with earlystage breast cancer (BC) who received helical tomotherapy (HT) after breast-conserving surgery. The dosimetric data of 30 patients (15 left-sided and 15 right-sided) with BC treated with 50.4 Gy to the whole breast and 64.4 Gy to the tumor bed in 28 fractions were analyzed. TPS doses were calculated and MOSFET doses were measured in the contralateral breast (CB) at cranial, caudal, and midpoint and 2 cm lateral to the central point. TPS and MOSFET doses were compared in the entire cohort as well as by tumor location (inner vs outer quadrant) and planning target volume of the breast ( < 1200 cc vs >= 1200 cc). The average doses at superior, inferior, central, and lateral points calculated with the TPS were 0.26 +/- 0.15 cGy, 0.21 +/- 0.09 cGy, 0.65 +/- 0.14 cGy, and 0.50 +/- 0.11 cGy, respectively, and were 0.37 +/- 0.16 cGy, 0.34 +/- 0.12 cGy, 0.60 +/- 0.18 cGy, and 0.34 +/- 0.15 cGy, respectively in MOSFET readings. Except for the central point, TPS-calculated doses and MOSFET readings were differed. The doses to the CB in patients with inner and outer quadrant tumors were not significantly different. In patients with large breasts, MOSFET doses were higher at superior and lateral points than TPS doses, but TPS doses were greater at inferior points. MOSFET readings were higher than TPS calculated doses in patients with inner or outer quadrant tumors in small or large breast volumes. The dose calculated by the TPS and that measured by MOSFET differed by a very small amount. The maximum dose to the CB administered at the midpoint was 1.8 Gy, as calculated using the TPS and confirmed using MOSFET detectors, in patients with early-stage BC undergoing breast-only radiotherapy with HT. (c) 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 66
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries [J].
Allemani, Claudia ;
Matsuda, Tomohiro ;
Di Carlo, Veronica ;
Harewood, Rhea ;
Matz, Melissa ;
Niksic, Maja ;
Bonaventure, Audrey ;
Valkov, Mikhail ;
Johnson, Christopher J. ;
Esteve, Jacques ;
Ogunbiyi, Olufemi J. ;
Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar ;
Chen, Wan-Qing ;
Eser, Sultan ;
Engholm, Gerda ;
Stiller, Charles A. ;
Monnereau, Alain ;
Woods, Ryan R. ;
Visser, Otto ;
Lim, Gek Hsiang ;
Aitken, Joanne ;
Weir, Hannah K. ;
Coleman, Michel P. .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10125) :1023-1075
[3]   Hypofractionated proton therapy in breast cancer: where are we? A critical review of the literature [J].
Alterio, Daniela ;
La Rocca, Eliana ;
Volpe, Stefania ;
Camarda, Anna Maria ;
Casbarra, Alessia ;
Russell-Edu, William ;
Zerella, Maria Alessia ;
Orecchia, Roberto ;
Galimberti, Viviana ;
Veronesi, Paolo ;
Leonardi, Maria Cristina ;
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 192 (02) :249-263
[4]   Contralateral breast dose from chest wall and breast irradiation: local experience [J].
Alzoubi, A. S. ;
Kandaiya, S. ;
Shukri, A. ;
Elsherbieny, E. .
AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2010, 33 (02) :137-144
[5]   Meta-analysis of long-term efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of early breast cancer [J].
Andrade, Teresa R. M. ;
Fonseca, Marcelo C. M. ;
Segreto, Helena R. C. ;
Segreto, Roberto A. ;
Martella, Eduardo ;
Nazario, Afonso C. P. .
BREAST, 2019, 48 :24-31
[6]   Measurement of the contralateral breast photon and neutron dose in breast cancer radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study [J].
Bagheri, Hamed ;
Farhood, Bagher ;
Mahdavi, Seied Rabi ;
Shekarchi, Babak ;
Manouchehri, Farhad ;
Esfandbod, Malahat .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (05) :1018-1023
[7]   In vivo dosimetry with MOSFETS: Dosimetric characterization and first clinical results in intraoperative radiotherapy [J].
Consorti, R ;
Petrucci, A ;
Fortunato, F ;
Soriani, A ;
Marzi, S ;
Iaccarino, G ;
Landoni, V ;
Benassi, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (03) :952-960
[8]   The Potential Role of Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy in the Regional Nodal Irradiation of Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study [J].
De Rose, F. ;
Cozzi, L. ;
Meattini, I ;
Fogliata, A. ;
Franceschini, D. ;
Franzese, C. ;
Tomatis, S. ;
Becherini, C. ;
Livi, L. ;
Scorsetti, M. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (01) :26-34
[9]   Optimization of skin dose using in-vivo MOSFET dose measurements in bolus/non-bolus fraction ratio: A VMAT and a 3DCRT study [J].
Dias, Anabela G. ;
Pinto, Diana F. S. ;
Borges, Maria F. ;
Pereira, Maria H. ;
Santos, Joao A. M. ;
Cunha, Luis T. ;
Lencart, Joana .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (02) :63-70
[10]   Comparing TomoHelical and TomoDirect in postmastectomy hypofractionated radiotherapy after immediate breast reconstruction [J].
Dicuonzo, Samantha ;
Patti, Filippo ;
Luraschi, Rosa ;
Frassoni, Samuele ;
Rojas, Damaris Patricia ;
Zaffaroni, Mattia ;
Morra, Anna ;
Gerardi, Marianna Alessandra ;
Zerella, Maria Alessia ;
Emiro, Francesca ;
Cattani, Federica ;
Bagnardi, Vincenzo ;
Fodor, Cristiana Iuliana ;
Veronesi, Paolo ;
Galimberti, Viviana Enrica ;
Orecchia, Roberto ;
Leonardi, Maria Cristina ;
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 90 :66-72