Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Nakanishi, Hayato [1 ,2 ]
Miangul, Shahid [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Rongzhi [3 ]
El Haddad, Joe [1 ,2 ]
El Ghazal, Nour [1 ,2 ]
Abdulsalam, Fatma A. [1 ,2 ]
Matar, Reem H. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Than, Christian A. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Johnson, Benjamin E. [6 ]
Chen, Herbert [3 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ London, London, England
[2] Univ Nicosia, Med Sch, Nicosia, Cyprus
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Biomed Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[6] NorthShore Univ Hlth Syst, Div Surg, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; OPEN ADRENALECTOMY; STAGE-I; OUTCOMES; CANCER; RESECTION; RECURRENCE; QUALITY; IMPACT; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-022-12711-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Laparoscopic surgery is considered a standard treatment for benign adrenal tumors; however, no consensus has been reached on the optimal resection technique for adrenocortical carcinomas. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in the management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Methods The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles from inception to May 2022, by two independent reviewers using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered prospectively on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022316050). Results From 183 studies screened, 11 studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1617 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic surgery (n = 472) or open surgery (n = 1145). Open surgery demonstrated a lower rate of positive resection margin compared with laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.10; I-2 = 0%). Additionally, open surgery had more favorable overall survival (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.72; I-2 = 0%) and recurrence-free rates (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; I-2 = 38%) than laparoscopic surgery at 3 years. Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic surgery than open surgery (mean difference - 2.49 days, 95% CI - 2.95 to - 2.04; I-2 = 45%). Conclusions Open surgery should still be considered the standard operative approach; however, laparoscopic surgery could be regarded as an effective and safe operation for selected adrenocortical carcinoma cases with appropriate laparoscopic expertise. Further randomized controlled studies with tumor stage- and resection margin-dependent survival analysis are necessary to ascertain the safety and efficacy of the treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1005
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy
    Cheng, Qiuye
    Pang, Tony C. Y.
    Hollands, Michael J.
    Richardson, Arthur J.
    Pleass, Henry
    Johnston, Emma S.
    Lam, Vincent W. T.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (06) : 1087 - 1099
  • [22] Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Peng, Long
    Lin, Shengrong
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Weidong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (08): : 3085 - 3097
  • [23] Open versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of diverticular colovesical fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Trejo-Avila, Mario
    Vergara-Fernandez, Omar
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (09) : E570 - E577
  • [24] Laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sathya, Chethan
    Wayne, Carolyn
    Gotsch, Anna
    Vincent, Jennifer
    Sullivan, Katrina J.
    Nasr, Ahmed
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 33 (03) : 325 - 333
  • [25] Short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery on colon carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Sun, Jin-Li
    Xing, Su-Yan
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (05) : 4645 - 4659
  • [26] Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martinez-Perez, Aleix
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Brunetti, Francesco
    Le Baleur, Yann
    Paya-Llorente, Carmen
    Memeo, Riccardo
    Gaiani, Federica
    Manfredi, Marco
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Nervi, Giorgio
    Coccolini, Federico
    Amiot, Aurelien
    Sobhani, Iradj
    Catena, Fausto
    de'Angelis, Gian Luigi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2017, 12
  • [27] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Kun
    Zou, Jianan
    Tang, Jianxiong
    Di, Jianzhong
    Han, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Pin
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (12) : 3031 - 3044
  • [28] Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamarajah, Sivesh K.
    Bundred, James
    Saint Marc, Olivier
    Jiao, Long R.
    Manas, Derek
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    White, Steven A.
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (01): : 6 - 14
  • [29] Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Solaini, Leonardo
    Bocchino, Antonio
    Avanzolini, Andrea
    Annunziata, Domenico
    Cavaliere, Davide
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (07) : 1497 - 1507
  • [30] Laparoscopic versus open pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Ke
    Pan, Yu
    Zhang, Bin
    Maher, Hendi
    Cai, Xiu-jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 53 : 243 - 256