High rate of clinically relevant improvement following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

被引:0
|
作者
Nyring, Marc Randall Kristensen [1 ,2 ]
Olsen, Bo Sanderhoff [1 ]
Amundsen, Alexander [1 ]
Rasmussen, Jeppe Vejlgaard [1 ]
机构
[1] Herlev & Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sect Shoulder & Elbow Surg, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Herlev & Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sect Shoulder & Elbow Surg, 12 Gentofte Hospitalsvej, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
Minimal clinically important difference; Patient reported outcome measures; Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty; Clinically relevant improvement; WESTERN ONTARIO OSTEOARTHRITIS; SCORE; WOOS; DEGENERATION; INDEX; CUFF;
D O I
10.5312/wjo.v15.i2.156
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest meaningful change in a health domain that a patient would identify as important. Thus, an improvement that exceeds the MCID can be used to define a successful treatment for the individual patient. AIM To quantify the rate of clinical improvement following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS Patients were treated with the Global Unite total shoulder platform arthroplasty between March 2017 and February 2019 at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). The rate of clinically relevant improvement was defined as the proportion of patients who had an improvement 24 months postoperatively that exceeded the MCID. Based on previous literature, MCID for WOOS, OSS, and CMS were defined as 12.3, 4.3, and 12.8 respectively. RESULTS Forty-nine patients with a Global Unite total shoulder platform arthroplasty were included for the final analysis. Mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range 49.0-79.0, SD: 8.3) and 65% were women. One patient was revised within the two years follow-up. The mean improvement from the preoperative assessment to the two-year follow-up was 46.1 points [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 39.7-53.3, P < 0.005] for WOOS, 18.2 points (95%CI: 15.5-21.0, P < 0.005) for OSS and 37.8 points (95%CI: 31.5-44.0, P < 0.005) for CMS. Two years postoperatively, 41 patients (87%) had an improvement in WOOS that exceeded the MCID, 45 patients (94%) had an improvement in OSS that exceeded the MCID, and 42 patients (88%) had an improvement in CMS that exceeded the MCID. CONCLUSION Based on three shoulder-specific outcome measures we find that approximately 90% of patients has a clinically relevant improvement. This is a clear message when informing patients about their prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The use of a modular system to convert an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS
    Weber-Spickschen, T. S.
    Alfke, D.
    Agneskirchner, J. D.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (12) : 1662 - 1667
  • [22] Mid-term outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Patel, Akshar V.
    White, Christopher A.
    Cirino, Carl M.
    Duey, Akiro H.
    Ranson, William A.
    Gross, Benjamin D.
    Mease, Samuel
    Galatz, Leesa M.
    Parsons, Bradford O.
    Flatow, Evan L.
    Cagle, Paul J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02) : 799 - 807
  • [23] Accelerated rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Lee, Jonathan
    Consigliere, Paolo
    Fawzy, Ernest
    Mariani, Laura
    Witney-Lagen, Caroline
    Natera, Luis
    Buch, Berta
    Atoun, Ehud
    Sforza, Giuseppe
    Amar, Eyal
    Levy, Ofer
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (09) : E545 - E557
  • [24] Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference
    Simovitch, Ryan
    Flurin, Pierre-Henri
    Wright, Thomas
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    Roche, Christopher P.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (02) : 298 - 305
  • [25] Timeline for maximal subjective outcome improvement following total ankle arthroplasty
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Cody, Elizabeth A.
    Johnson, Phillip K.
    Yao, Kaisen
    Nunley II, James A.
    Amin, Nirav H.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (03) : 305 - 310
  • [26] Comparison between Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Older Adults with Osteoarthritis without Rotator Cuff Tears
    Kim, Seong Hun
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [27] Clinical outcomes of anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and limited forward elevation
    Trammell, A. P.
    Hao, K. A.
    Hones, K. M.
    Wright, J. O.
    Wright, T. W.
    Vasilopoulos, T.
    Schoch, B. S.
    King, J. J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2023, 105B (12) : 1303 - 1313
  • [28] What influences the surgeon’s decision between anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis? A case-vignette study
    Dries Boulidam
    Arno A. Macken
    Tim Kraal
    Tjarco D. W. Alta
    Michel P. J. van den Bekerom
    Laurent Lafosse
    Thibault Lafosse
    Geert A. Buijze
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 26 (1)
  • [29] How does depressive disorder impact outcomes in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
    Diamond, Keith B.
    Gordon, Adam M.
    Sheth, Bhavya K.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Choueka, Jack
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (09) : 1886 - 1892
  • [30] Establishing maximal medical improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Forsythe, Brian
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (09) : 1711 - 1720