High rate of clinically relevant improvement following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

被引:0
|
作者
Nyring, Marc Randall Kristensen [1 ,2 ]
Olsen, Bo Sanderhoff [1 ]
Amundsen, Alexander [1 ]
Rasmussen, Jeppe Vejlgaard [1 ]
机构
[1] Herlev & Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sect Shoulder & Elbow Surg, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Herlev & Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sect Shoulder & Elbow Surg, 12 Gentofte Hospitalsvej, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
Minimal clinically important difference; Patient reported outcome measures; Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty; Clinically relevant improvement; WESTERN ONTARIO OSTEOARTHRITIS; SCORE; WOOS; DEGENERATION; INDEX; CUFF;
D O I
10.5312/wjo.v15.i2.156
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest meaningful change in a health domain that a patient would identify as important. Thus, an improvement that exceeds the MCID can be used to define a successful treatment for the individual patient. AIM To quantify the rate of clinical improvement following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS Patients were treated with the Global Unite total shoulder platform arthroplasty between March 2017 and February 2019 at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). The rate of clinically relevant improvement was defined as the proportion of patients who had an improvement 24 months postoperatively that exceeded the MCID. Based on previous literature, MCID for WOOS, OSS, and CMS were defined as 12.3, 4.3, and 12.8 respectively. RESULTS Forty-nine patients with a Global Unite total shoulder platform arthroplasty were included for the final analysis. Mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range 49.0-79.0, SD: 8.3) and 65% were women. One patient was revised within the two years follow-up. The mean improvement from the preoperative assessment to the two-year follow-up was 46.1 points [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 39.7-53.3, P < 0.005] for WOOS, 18.2 points (95%CI: 15.5-21.0, P < 0.005) for OSS and 37.8 points (95%CI: 31.5-44.0, P < 0.005) for CMS. Two years postoperatively, 41 patients (87%) had an improvement in WOOS that exceeded the MCID, 45 patients (94%) had an improvement in OSS that exceeded the MCID, and 42 patients (88%) had an improvement in CMS that exceeded the MCID. CONCLUSION Based on three shoulder-specific outcome measures we find that approximately 90% of patients has a clinically relevant improvement. This is a clear message when informing patients about their prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Radiographic performance depends on the radial glenohumeral mismatch in total shoulder arthroplasty
    Anita Hasler
    Dominik C. Meyer
    Timo Tondelli
    Tobias Dietrich
    Christian Gerber
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [12] Anatomical total shoulder replacement with rotator cuff repair for osteoarthritis of the shoulder
    Simone, J. P.
    Streubel, P. H.
    Sperling, J. W.
    Schleck, C. D.
    Cofield, R. H.
    Athwal, G. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (02): : 224 - 228
  • [13] Outcome of Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty After Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis
    Rasmussen, Jeppe V.
    Olsen, Bo S.
    Al-Hamdani, Ali
    Brorson, Stig
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (19): : 1631 - 1637
  • [14] Total Shoulder Arthroplasty After Previous Arthroscopic Surgery for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Case-Control Matched Cohort Study
    Nolte, Philip-C
    Elrick, Bryant P.
    Arner, Justin W.
    Ridley, T. J.
    Woolson, Thomas E.
    Tross, Anna-K
    Midtgaard, Kaare S.
    Millett, Peter J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (07): : 1839 - 1846
  • [15] Reverse versus anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact cuff: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
    Daher, Mohammad
    Boufadel, Peter
    Fares, Mohamad Y.
    Lopez, Ryan
    Goltz, Daniel E.
    Khan, Adam Z.
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (01) : 190 - 202
  • [16] Patient-reported outcome after stemmed versus stemless total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a patient-blinded randomized clinical trial
    Issa, Zaid
    Rasmussen, Jeppe Vejlgaard
    Petersen, John Kloth
    Schantz, Kim
    Brorson, Stig
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [17] Mid-term results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with posterior glenoid deficiency and humeral subluxation
    Collin, Philippe
    Herve, Anthony
    Walch, Gilles
    Boileau, Pascal
    Muniandy, Moganadass
    Chelli, Mickael
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (10) : 2023 - 2030
  • [18] Improvement in sleep quality after total shoulder arthroplasty
    Weinberg, Maxwell
    Mollon, Brent
    Kaplan, Daniel
    Zuckerman, Joseph
    Strauss, Eric
    PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 2020, 48 (02): : 194 - 198
  • [20] The Comparative Effect of Age on Clinical Outcomes Following Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Shah, Sarav S.
    Fu, Michael C.
    Ling, Daphne
    Wong, Alexandra
    Warren, Russell F.
    Dines, David M.
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Gulotta, Lawrence, V
    Taylor, Samuel A.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 44 (04) : E600 - E606