Methodological challenges in systematic reviews of mHealth interventions: Survey and consensus-based recommendations

被引:1
作者
Lopez-Alcalde, Jesus [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wieland, L. Susan [5 ]
Barth, Jurgen
Grainger, Rebecca [6 ]
Baxter, Nancy [7 ]
Heron, Neil [8 ,9 ]
Triantafyllidis, Andreas [10 ]
Carrion, Carme [11 ]
Trecca, Eleonora M. C. [12 ,13 ]
Holl, Felix [14 ,15 ]
Wagner, Ana Maria [14 ]
Edney, Sarah [17 ]
Yan, Yuqian [1 ,2 ]
Campos-Asensio, Concepcion [16 ]
Villanueva, Gemma [18 ]
Ramsey, Rachelle R. [19 ,20 ]
Witt, Claudia M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,21 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Complementary & Integrat Med, Sonneggstr 6, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Francisco de Vitoria UFV, Fac Med, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Ramon y Cajal, Unidad Bioestadist Clin, Inst Ramon y Cajal Invest Sanitaria IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Maryland, Ctr Integrat Med, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Otago Wellington, Dept Med, Wellington, New Zealand
[7] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, North Ireland
[9] Keele Univ, Sch Med, Keele, Staffs, England
[10] Ctr Res & Technol Hellas, Informat Technol Inst, Thessaloniki, Greece
[11] Univ Oberta Catalunya UOC, eHlth Lab Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[12] IRCCS Hosp Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Maxillofacial Surg, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
[13] Univ Hosp Foggia, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Foggia, Italy
[14] Neu Ulm Univ Appl Sci, DigiHlth Inst, Neu Ulm, Germany
[15] Ludwig Maximilian Univ Munich, Inst Med Informat Proc Biometry & Epidemiol, Munich, Germany
[16] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Complejo Hosp Univ Insular Maternoinfantil, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Inst Invest Biomed & Sanitarias, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[17] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[18] Cochrane, Cochrane Response, London, England
[19] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Behav Med & Clin Psychol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[20] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[21] Charite, Inst Social Med Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Digital health; eHealth; Systematic reviews; Meta; -analysis; Survey; GUIDANCE; CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105345
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: Mobile Health (mHealth) refers to using mobile devices to support health. This study aimed to identify specific methodological challenges in systematic reviews (SRs) of mHealth interventions and to develop guidance for addressing selected challenges. Study Design and Setting: Two-phase participatory research project. First, we sent an online survey to corresponding authors of SRs of mHealth interventions. On a five -category scale, survey respondents rated how challenging they found 24 methodological aspects in SRs of mHealth interventions compared to non-mHealth intervention SRs. Second, a subset of survey respondents participated in an online workshop to discuss recommendations to address the most challenging methodological aspects identified in the survey. Finally, consensusbased recommendations were developed based on the workshop discussion and subsequent interaction via email with the workshop participants and two external mHealth SR authors. Results: We contacted 953 corresponding authors of mHealth intervention SRs, of whom 50 (5 %) completed the survey. All the respondents identified at least one methodological aspect as more or much more challenging in mHealth intervention SRs than in non-mHealth SRs. A median of 11 (IQR 7.25-15) out of 24 aspects (46 %) were rated as more or much more challenging. Those most frequently reported were: defining intervention intensity and components (85 %), extracting mHealth intervention details (71 %), dealing with dynamic research with evolving interventions (70 %), assessing intervention integrity (69 %), defining the intervention (66 %) and maintaining an updated review (65 %). Eleven survey respondents participated in the workshop (five had authored more than three mHealth SRs). Eighteen consensus -based recommendations were developed to address issues related to mHealth intervention integrity and to keep mHealth SRs up to date. Conclusion: mHealth SRs present specific methodological challenges compared to non-mHealth interventions, particularly related to intervention integrity and keeping SRs current. Our recommendations for addressing these challenges can improve mHealth SRs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist
    Agarwal, Smisha
    LeFevre, Amnesty E.
    Lee, Jaime
    L'Engle, Kelly
    Mehl, Garrett
    Sinha, Chaitali
    Labrique, Alain
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Digital health trends 2021
  • [3] The NICE MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid) health apps search filters: development of validated filters to retrieve evidence about health apps
    Ayiku, Lynda
    Hudson, Thomas
    Glover, Sarah
    Walsh, Nicola
    Adams, Rachel
    Deane, Jemma
    Finnegan, Amy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 37
  • [4] Relevance of CONSORT reporting criteria for research on eHealth interventions
    Baker, Timothy B.
    Gustafson, David H.
    Shaw, Bret
    Hawkins, Robert
    Pingree, Suzy
    Roberts, Linda
    Strecher, Victor
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 81 : S77 - S86
  • [5] Review and Analysis of Existing Mobile Phone Apps to Support Heart Failure Symptom Monitoring and Self-Care Management Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS)
    Creber, Ruth M. Masterson
    Maurer, Mathew S.
    Reading, Meghan
    Hiraldo, Grenny
    Hickey, Kathleen T.
    Iribarren, Sarah
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2016, 4 (02): : 470 - 482
  • [6] Smartphone-Delivered Ecological Momentary Interventions Based on Ecological Momentary Assessments to Promote Health Behaviors: Systematic Review and Adapted Checklist for Reporting Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention Studies
    Dao, Kim Phuong
    De Cocker, Katrien
    Tong, Huong Ly
    Kocaballi, A. Baki
    Chow, Clara
    Laranjo, Liliana
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (11):
  • [7] Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how
    Elliott, Julian H.
    Synnot, Anneliese
    Turner, Tan
    Simmonds, Mark
    Akl, Elie A.
    McDonald, Steve
    Salanti, Georgia
    Meerpohl, Joerg
    MacLehose, Harriet
    Hilton, John
    Tovey, David
    Shemilt, Ian
    Thomas, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 91 : 23 - 30
  • [8] European Commission, 2014, Green Paper on Mobile Health
  • [9] CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions
    Eysenbach, Gunther
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04)
  • [10] Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    King, Valerie J.
    Hamel, Candyce
    Kamel, Chris
    Affengruber, Lisa
    Stevens, Adrienne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 130 : 13 - 22