Post-separation parenting apps in the hands of family law practitioners: expectations versus experience

被引:0
作者
Irving, Michelle A. [1 ]
Heard, Genevieve [2 ]
Smyth, Bruce M. [1 ]
Payne, Jason L. [3 ]
Althor, Glenn [4 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, Australia
[2] Relationships Australia Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Gold Coast, Australia
[4] Relationships Australia Canberra & Reg Relationshi, Canberra, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Information and communications technology; Divorce; Mobile apps; Parental separation; Smartphone; Family communication; TECHNOLOGY; VIOLENCE;
D O I
10.1093/lawfam/ebad027
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Post-separation parenting apps are an alternative to mainstream digital communication (e.g. text and email) for separated parents. They vary in cost and features, generally incorporating a messaging tool, shared calendar, expense tracker, and the ability to export records for legal purposes. While often recommended in the context of family law, evidence for efficacy and safety is lacking. This study sought insights from family law professionals about the value of post-separation parenting apps in high-conflict cases. Thirty family mediators, known in Australia as Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners, role-played pairs of high-conflict separated parents using one of 10 popular post-separation parenting apps. After completing a set of common co-parenting tasks, dyadic interviews and focus groups were used to discuss their observations. Overall, practitioners expressed disappointment with the apps. Key themes included potential individual differences in separated parents' technical skills, time availability, and intentions towards app use. Usability challenges specific to the tested apps were also identified. Rather than simplifying interactions for separated parents, these combined contextual variables were thought likely to contribute to frustration and inter-parental conflict. As a result, practitioners in the study resolved to be far more cautious with app recommendations for high-conflict clients.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
2forkids, 'Living separated with simplicity'
[2]  
2houses, 'We help separated parents communicate'
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, U.S
[4]   How Instagram's algorithm is censoring women and vulnerable users but helping online abusers [J].
Are, Carolina .
FEMINIST MEDIA STUDIES, 2020, 20 (05) :741-744
[5]  
Australian Family Lawyers, '9 of the best co -parenting apps for divorced parents to make family life easier
[6]   The Ethics of App-Assisted Family Mediation [J].
Barsky, Allan E. .
CONFLICT RESOLUTION QUARTERLY, 2016, 34 (01) :31-42
[7]  
Binns Reuben, 2017, Social Informatics. 9th International Conference, SocInfo 2017. Proceedings: LNCS 10540, P405, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_32
[8]   A comprehensive survey on sentiment analysis: Approaches, challenges and trends [J].
Birjali, Marouane ;
Kasri, Mohammed ;
Beni-Hssane, Abderrahim .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2021, 226
[9]   Rape: is there an app for that? An empirical analysis of the features of anti-rape apps [J].
Bivens, Rena ;
Hasinoff, Amy Adele .
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2018, 21 (08) :1050-1067
[10]  
Braun V, 2016, ROUT INT HANDB, P191