Association of MGMT Promoter and Enhancer Methylation with Genetic Variants, Clinical Parameters, and Demographic Characteristics in Glioblastoma

被引:3
作者
Zappe, Katja [1 ]
Puehringer, Katharina [1 ]
Pflug, Simon [1 ]
Berger, Daniel [1 ]
Weis, Serge [2 ]
Spiegl-Kreinecker, Sabine [3 ]
Cichna-Markl, Margit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Chem, Dept Analyt Chem, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Kepler Univ Hosp GmbH, Dept Pathol & Mol Pathol, Div Neuropathol, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[3] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Kepler Univ Hosp GmbH, Dept Neurosurg, A-4040 Linz, Austria
关键词
glioblastoma; MGMT; DNA methylation; enhancer methylation; promoter methylation; biomarker; Ki-67; overall survival; age; RS2853669; POLYMORPHISM; ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE; MUTATIONS; SURVIVAL; RADIOTHERAPY; CONCOMITANT; EXPRESSION; RESISTANCE; RS16906252; BIOMARKER;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15245777
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The response of glioblastoma (GBM) patients to the alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) vitally depends on the expression level of the repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Since MGMT is strongly regulated by promoter methylation, the methylation status of the MGMT promoter has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for GBM patients. By determining the methylation levels of the four enhancers located within or close to the MGMT gene, we recently found that enhancer methylation contributes to MGMT regulation. In this study, we investigated if methylation of the four enhancers is associated with SNP rs16906252, TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T, TERT SNP rs2853669, proliferation index Ki-67, overall survival (OS), age, and sex of the patients. In general, associations with genetic variants, clinical parameters, and demographic characteristics were caused by a complex interplay of multiple CpGs in the MGMT promoter and of multiple CpGs in enhancer regions. The observed associations for intragenic enhancer 4, located in intron 2 of MGMT, differed from associations observed for the three intergenic enhancers. Some findings were restricted to subgroups of samples with either methylated or unmethylated MGMT promoters, underpinning the relevance of the MGMT promoter status in GBMs.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Alkhaibary Ali, 2019, Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther, V12, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.hemonc.2018.11.001
  • [2] A combination of TERT promoter mutation and MGMT methylation status predicts clinically relevant subgroups of newly diagnosed glioblastomas
    Arita, Hideyuki
    Yamasaki, Kai
    Matsushita, Yuko
    Nakamura, Taishi
    Shimokawa, Asanao
    Takami, Hirokazu
    Tanaka, Shota
    Mukasa, Akitake
    Shirahata, Mitsuaki
    Shimizu, Saki
    Suzuki, Kaori
    Saito, Kuniaki
    Kobayashi, Keiichi
    Higuchi, Fumi
    Uzuka, Takeo
    Otani, Ryohei
    Tamura, Kaoru
    Sumita, Kazutaka
    Ohno, Makoto
    Miyakita, Yasuji
    Kagawa, Naoki
    Hashimoto, Naoya
    Hatae, Ryusuke
    Yoshimoto, Koji
    Shinojima, Naoki
    Nakamura, Hideo
    Kanemura, Yonehiro
    Okita, Yoshiko
    Kinoshita, Manabu
    Ishibashi, Kenichi
    Shofuda, Tomoko
    Kodama, Yoshinori
    Mori, Kanji
    Tomogane, Yusuke
    Fukai, Junya
    Fujita, Koji
    Terakawa, Yuzo
    Tsuyuguchi, Naohiro
    Moriuchi, Shusuke
    Nonaka, Masahiro
    Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
    Shibuya, Makoto
    Maehara, Taketoshi
    Saito, Nobuhito
    Nagane, Motoo
    Kawahara, Nobutaka
    Ueki, Keisuke
    Yoshimine, Toshiki
    Miyaoka, Etsuo
    Nishikawa, Ryo
    [J]. ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 4 : 79
  • [3] Is Ki-67 index overexpression in IDH wild type glioblastoma a predictor of shorter Progression Free survival? A clinical and Molecular analytic investigation
    Armocida, Daniele
    Frati, Alessandro
    Salvati, Maurizio
    Santoro, Antonio
    Pesce, Alessandro
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 198
  • [4] A new tool for technical standardization of the Ki67 immunohistochemical assay
    Aung, Thazin Nwe
    Acs, Balazs
    Warrell, Jonathan
    Bai, Yalai
    Gaule, Patricia
    Martinez-Morilla, Sandra
    Vathiotis, Ioannis
    Shafi, Saba
    Moutafi, Myrto
    Gerstein, Mark
    Freiberg, Benjamin
    Fulton, Regan
    Rimm, David L.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (07) : 1261 - 1270
  • [5] Understanding TERT Promoter Mutations: A Common Path to Immortality
    Bell, Robert J. A.
    Rube, H. Tomas
    Xavier-Magalhaes, Ana
    Costa, Bruno M.
    Mancini, Andrew
    Song, Jun S.
    Costello, Joseph F.
    [J]. MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 14 (04) : 315 - 323
  • [6] The prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma: A meta-analysis of clinical trials
    Binabaj, Maryam Moradi
    Bahrami, Afsane
    ShahidSales, Soodabeh
    Joodi, Marjan
    Mashhad, Mona Joudi
    Hassanian, Seyed Mahdi
    Anvari, Kazem
    Avan, Amir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 233 (01) : 378 - 386
  • [7] Temozolomide Concomitant and Adjuvant to Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma Correlation With MGMT Promoter Methylation Status
    Brandes, Alba A.
    Franceschi, Enrico
    Tosoni, Alicia
    Benevento, Francesca
    Scopece, Luciano
    Mazzocchi, Valeria
    Bacci, Antonella
    Agati, Raffaele
    Calbucci, Fabio
    Ermani, Mario
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (15) : 3512 - 3518
  • [8] High expression of DNA topoisomerase IIα and Ki-67 antigen is associated with prolonged survival glioblastoma patients
    Bredel, M
    Piribauer, M
    Marosi, C
    Birner, P
    Gatterbauer, B
    Fischer, I
    Ströbel, T
    Rössler, K
    Budka, H
    Hainfellner, JA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (10) : 1343 - 1347
  • [9] Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Glioblastoma
    Brown, Nicholas F.
    Ottaviani, Diego
    Tazare, John
    Gregson, John
    Kitchen, Neil
    Brandner, Sebastian
    Fersht, Naomi
    Mulholland, Paul
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [10] To loop or not to loop: what is the role of TADs in enhancer function and gene regulation?
    Cavalheiro, Gabriel R.
    Pollex, Tim
    Furlong, Eileen E. M.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 67 : 119 - 129