University engagement in open innovation and intellectual property: evidence from university-industry collaborations

被引:6
作者
Corsino, Marco [1 ]
Torrisi, Salvatore [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Management, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Econ Management & Stat, Milan, Italy
关键词
Open innovation; Research partnerships; Inventor motivations; Academic patents; University ownership; Licensing; O31; O32; O34; O36; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; GRADUATE-STUDENTS; COMMERCIALIZATION; INVENTIONS; PATENTS; OWNERSHIP; FACULTY; SCIENTISTS; MANAGEMENT; MOTIVES;
D O I
10.1007/s40812-023-00280-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
University-industry collaborations are an important pathway through which academic scientists engage with industry and society, co-create new knowledge, and raise funds to carry out costly research endeavors. Nonetheless, the management of such collaborations is challenging and requires universities to protect their investments in intellectual property and to capture value from them. This paper examines how scientists' motivations to undertake inventive activities shape the relationship between research partnerships, the ownership of academic patents resulting from such partnerships, and the licensing of university-owned patents. We examine the interactions between these factors using data on 501 research projects conducted by scientists affiliated with universities located in various countries. Our analysis indicates that the inventors' motivations bear a direct effect on the ownership and commercialization of academic patents. Moreover, these motivations positively moderate the relationship between research partnerships and the management of academic patents. These findings have interesting implications for university administrators striving to enhance the effectiveness of the technology transfer process.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 813
页数:33
相关论文
共 86 条
[41]   Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' [J].
Jensen, RA ;
Thursby, JG ;
Thursby, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2003, 21 (09) :1271-1300
[42]   Open innovation in science: assessing the formation and function of SME-university collaborations through the proximity matrix [J].
Johnston, Andrew .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2022, 29 (02) :310-332
[43]   Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models [J].
Karaca-Mandic, Pinar ;
Norton, Edward C. ;
Dowd, Bryan .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 47 (01) :255-274
[44]   Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model [J].
Kenney, Martin ;
Patton, Donald .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (09) :1407-1422
[45]   What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists [J].
Krabel, Stefan ;
Mueller, Pamela .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (06) :947-956
[46]   Incentives and invention in universities [J].
Lach, Saul ;
Schankerman, Mark .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2008, 39 (02) :403-433
[47]   What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: 'Gold', 'ribbon' or 'puzzle'? [J].
Lam, Alice .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (10) :1354-1368
[48]   Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms [J].
Laursen, K ;
Salter, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (02) :131-150
[49]   The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration [J].
Laursen, Keld ;
Salter, Ammon J. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (05) :867-878