Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Performance of Crop Production in Relation to Crop Rotation, Catch Crops, and Tillage

被引:5
作者
Auzins, Alberts [1 ]
Leimane, Ieva [1 ]
Krievina, Agnese [1 ]
Morozova, Inga [1 ]
Miglavs, Andris [2 ]
Lakovskis, Peteris [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Agr Resources & Econ, LV-1039 Riga, Latvia
[2] Do Consult Ltd, LV-1021 Riga, Latvia
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
crop rotation; catch crops; tillage; nitrogen use efficiency; gross margin; Latvia; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; COVER CROPS; NITROGEN; DIVERSITY; QUALITY; CARBON;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture13081539
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Crop production constitutes a significant portion of the EU's agricultural output and influences land use decisions. Various elements within the crop production system can significantly impact its outcomes. This paper aims to evaluate the environmental and economic performance of crop rotation, catch crops, and different tillage practices in Latvia by analyzing data from case studies, field trials, and field monitoring to identify the potential for improvement towards a more sustainable utilization of agricultural land. Environmental performance was evaluated by focusing on nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), as it is likely to play a significant role in assessing the environmental suitability of crop production according to the Platform on Sustainable Finance. For economic performance, gross margins were calculated. Crop rotation in Latvia tends to be monotonous, with wheat and oilseed rape dominating over 60% of the cultivated area due to their profitability. The findings of this study indicate that achieving a minimum NUE of 70% is challenging. Crop rotations including oilseed rape, particularly the common wheat-oilseed rape rotation, have an average NUE below the threshold, while proper use of catch crops may increase NUE by 7-9%. The three-year field trials on commercial farms yielded divergent findings about the impact of various tillage practices on NUE and gross margin. However, the field trials conducted on the farm practicing reduced tillage for over ten years show higher NUE compared to ploughing. The advantage of reduced tillage was supported by the obtained results indicating lower costs of agrotechnical operations, including less diesel consumption.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]  
Selyaninov G.T., 1928, Proc. Agric. Meteorol, V20, P165
[42]  
Selzer T., 2019, ANN APPL BIOL, V174, P179
[43]  
Skowera B, 2014, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V23, P195
[44]   The role of 15N in tracing N dynamics in agro-ecosystems under alternative systems of tillage management: A review [J].
Smith, Christopher J. ;
Chalk, Phillip M. .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2020, 197
[45]   Trade-off between the economic and environmental sustainability in Czech dual farm structure [J].
Spicka, Jindrich ;
Vintr, Tomas ;
Aulova, Renata ;
Machackova, Jana .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2020, 66 (06) :243-250
[46]   The Tradeoff analysis model: integrated bio-physical and economic modeling of agricultural production systems [J].
Stoorvogel, JJ ;
Antle, JM ;
Crissman, CC ;
Bowen, W .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 80 (01) :43-66
[47]  
Talgre L., 2013, Ph.D. Thesis
[48]  
Talgre L, 2011, ZEMDIRBYSTE, V98, P251
[49]   Cover Crops Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Agroecosystems: A Global Meta-Analysis [J].
Thapa, Resham ;
Mirsky, Steven B. ;
Tully, Katherine L. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 47 (06) :1400-1411
[50]   Yields of wheat and soil carbon and nitrogen contents following long-term incorporation of barley straw and ryegrass catch crops [J].
Thomsen, IK ;
Christensen, BT .
SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 20 (04) :432-438