An overview of innovative living arrangements within long-term care and their characteristics: a scoping review

被引:10
作者
Brouwers, Mara [1 ,2 ]
Broekharst, Damien S. E. [3 ,4 ]
de Boer, Bram [1 ,2 ]
Groen, Wim G. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Verbeek, Hilde [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Hlth Serv Res, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Living Lab Ageing & Long Term Care, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Univ Network Care Sect South Holland, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Med Older People, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Amsterdam Movement Sci Ageing & Vital Rehabil & De, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Innovative living arrangements; Innovation; Long-term care; 24-hour care; Nursing home care; Older adults; Scoping review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SHARED-HOUSING ARRANGEMENTS; PERSON-CENTERED CARE; HOME-LIKE FACILITIES; SMALL-SCALE; NURSING-HOME; DEMENTIA-CARE; RESIDENTIAL CARE; FAMILY CAREGIVERS; HEALTH OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-023-04158-9
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundWithin long-term care, a culture change (e.g. focus on increasing autonomy in everyday life) is leading to the development of innovative living arrangements for older adults. Insight into characteristics of innovative living arrangements, which are described as an alternative to regular nursing homes, is lacking. This review aims to provide an overview of innovative living arrangements and to describe their defining characteristics.MethodsA scoping review was performed following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses with extension, for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was also followed. The databases PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Articles, published between 2012 and 2023 were included when they presented an innovative living arrangement as an alternative to regular nursing homes. A thematic analysis was performed, describing the physical, social, and organizational environment of the innovative living arrangements.ResultsFifty-six articles were identified describing seven types of distinct innovative living arrangements: small-scale living, the green house model, shared housing arrangements, green care farms, dementia villages, group homes, intergenerational living, and an 'other' category. The themes included supporting autonomy and creating a small-scale and/or homelike environment, which were emphasized in most innovative living arrangements. Other themes, such as involvement of the community, focus on nature, integration of work tasks, and involvement of family members, were emphasized in a subsection of the described living arrangements. Twenty-eight articles reported on the effects of the innovative living environment on residents, family members, or staff members. Most articles (N = 22) studied resident-related outcomes, focusing mainly on quality of life and aspects of daily life.ConclusionMore insight into the mechanisms of the social and organizational environments is needed, which may lead to greater transparency and homogeneity regarding the description of living arrangements. This review shows that more knowledge is needed about the potential key elements of innovative living arrangements, especially related to their social and organizational environment. This may provide a better guide for developers within long-term care.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care
    Abdi, Jordan
    Al-Hindawi, Ahmed
    Ng, Tiffany
    Vizcaychipi, Marcela P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [2] The Impact of Organizational Innovations in Nursing Homes on Staff Perceptions: A Secondary Data Analysis
    Adams, Joost
    Verbeek, Hilde
    Zwakhalen, Sandra M. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2017, 49 (01) : 54 - 62
  • [3] Agich George., 1993, AUTONOMY LONG TERM C
  • [4] The impact of work culture on quality of care in nursing homes - a review study
    Andre, Beate
    Sjovold, Endre
    Rannestad, Toril
    Ringdal, Gerd I.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2014, 28 (03) : 449 - 457
  • [5] Eldercare Service Redesign in Finland: Deinstitutionalization of Long-Term Care
    Anttonen, Anneli
    Karsio, Olli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SERVICE RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (02) : 151 - 166
  • [6] Intergenerational Housing: The Case of Humanitas Netherlands
    Arentshorst, Marlous Elisabeth
    Kloet, Roy Reinier
    Peine, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY, 2019, 33 (03) : 244 - 256
  • [7] Arskey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [8] "There's No Place Like Home": A Scoping Review on the Impact of Homelike Residential Care Models on Resident-, Family-, and Staff-Related Outcomes
    Ausserhofer, Dietmar
    Deschodt, Mieke
    De Geest, Sabina
    van Achterberg, Theo
    Meyer, Gabriele
    Verbeek, Hilde
    Sjetne, Ingeborg Stromseng
    Malinowska-Lipien, Iwona
    Griffiths, Peter
    Schlueter, Wilfried
    Ellen, Moriah
    Engberg, Sandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2016, 17 (08) : 685 - 693
  • [9] Innovative Communities: A Global Nursing Perspective
    Baumann, Steven L.
    [J]. NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2021, 34 (03) : 316 - 321
  • [10] Meaning of Home in Later Life as a Concept to Understand Older Adults' Housing Needs: Results from the 7 Age-Friendly Cities Pilot Project in Quebec
    Bigonnesse, Catherine
    Beaulieu, Marie
    Garon, Suzanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY, 2014, 28 (04) : 357 - 382