Improvement and Application of Blockchain Consensus Algorithm for Distributed Power Energy System

被引:0
|
作者
Liang, Junlong [1 ]
Wu, Xiaoming [1 ]
Liu, Xiangzhi [1 ]
Chen, Ran [1 ]
机构
[1] Qilu Univ Technol, Shandong Acad Sci, Shandong Comp Sci Ctr, Natl Supercomp Ctr Jinan, Jinan, Peoples R China
来源
2023 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA ANALYTICS, ICBDA | 2023年
关键词
Blockchain; consensus algorithm; distributed power energy; security; performance; scalability; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1109/ICBDA57405.2023.10104765
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article focuses on the application of blockchain consensus algorithms in the power energy trading system and the comparison of these algorithms such as PBFT(Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance), Raft and IBFT(Istanbul Byzantine Fault Tolerance). The article introduces the concept of blockchain consensus algorithms and its application in power energy trading system. It then provides a brief overview of the three algorithms and their underlying structures. The comparison of the algorithms is done in terms of features such as scalability, reliability and security. The article also provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each algorithm and its application in power energy trading system. We examine the blockchain partition algorithm improved by the integration of Raft consensus and IBFT consensus, with a special focus on the advantages of using a hybrid algorithm in distributed networks. We discuss the need for consensus algorithms that are well-suited to blockchain networks and the improved security provided by a consensus algorithm incorporating both Raft and IBFT.We also discuss the implications of incorporating Raft and IBFT into a blockchain partition algorithm and its potential scalability. In conclusion, we provide a synthesis of our research, with potentials for further studies and contributions in this field.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 82
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distributed new energy system access based on blockchain Consensus Algorithm
    Wang, Wenhao
    Sun, Jianmei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS, 2024, 25 (04) : 533 - 540
  • [2] Research on Distributed Energy Consensus Mechanism Based on Blockchain in Virtual Power Plant
    Wang, Dewen
    Wang, Zhao
    Lian, Xin
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (05)
  • [3] A Weak Consensus Algorithm and Its Application to High-Performance Blockchain
    Wang, Qin
    Li, Rujia
    IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS (IEEE INFOCOM 2021), 2021,
  • [4] Enhancing computational scalability in Blockchain by leveraging improvement in consensus algorithm
    Jabbar, Sohail
    Abideen, Zain Ul
    Khalid, Shehzad
    Ahmad, Awais
    Raza, Umar
    Akram, Sheeraz
    FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 5
  • [5] A Blockchain Consensus Mechanism to Optimize Reputation-Based Distributed Energy Trading in Urban Energy System
    Zhao, Chen
    Han, Dong
    Li, Chao
    Wang, Han
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 53698 - 53712
  • [6] eRoc: a Distributed Blockchain System with Fast Consensus
    Zhong, Lin
    Duan, Xihua
    Wang, Yujue
    Chen, Jingyan
    Liu, Jidong
    Wang, Xiaoguang
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER-ENABLED DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY (CYBERC), 2019, : 205 - 214
  • [7] MBFT: A New Consensus Algorithm for Consortium Blockchain
    Du, Mingxiao
    Chen, Qijun
    Ma, Xiaofeng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 87665 - 87675
  • [8] A Pattern for Proof of Work Consensus Algorithm in Blockchain
    Ul Abadin, Zain
    Syed, Madiha Haider
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON PATTERN LANGUAGES OF PROGRAMS 2021, EUROPLOP 2021, 2021,
  • [9] Distributed Multi-area Optimal Power Flow Algorithm Based on Blockchain Consensus Mechanism
    Zhang L.
    Chen S.
    Yan Z.
    Shen Z.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2020, 40 (20): : 6433 - 6441
  • [10] Blockchain = Distributed Ledger + ConsensusBlockchain = Distributed Ledger + Consensus
    Andreas Meier
    Henrik Stormer
    HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2018, 55 (6) : 1139 - 1154