Coronary disease in refractory cardiac arrest undergoing resuscitation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Aims Because re-establishment of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients with cardiac arrest is frequently not achieved by conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR), selected patients may undergo resuscitation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (E-CPR). We compared angiographic features and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between patients undergoing E-CPR and those with ROSC after C-CPR. Methods and results Forty-nine consecutive E-CPR patients undergoing immediate coronary angiography admitted between August 2013 and August 2022 were matched to 49 patients with ROSC after C-CPR. Multivessel disease (69.4% vs. 34.7%; P = 0.001), >= 50% unprotected left main (ULM) stenosis (18.4% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.025), and >= 1 chronic total occlusion (CTO) (28.6% vs. 10.2%; P = 0.021) were more often documented in E-CPR group. There was no significant differences in the incidence, features, and distribution of acute culprit lesion which was present in >90%. Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) (27.6 vs. 13.4; P = 0.002) and GENSINI (86.2 vs. 46.0; P = 0.001) scores were increased in E-CPR group. Optimal cut-off predicting E-CPR was 19.75 for SYNTAX (sensitivity 74%, specificity 87%) and 60.50 (sensitivity 69%, specificity 75%) for GENSINI score. More lesions were treated (1.3 vs. 1.1 lesions/patient; P = 0.002) and stents implanted (2.0 vs. 1.3/patient; P < 0.001) in E-CPR group. Final TIMI three flow was comparable (88.6% vs. 95.7%; P = 0.196) but residual SYNTAX (13.6 vs. 3.1; P < 0.001) and GENSINI (36.7 vs. 10.9; P < 0.001) scores remained increased in E-CPR group. Conclusion Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients have more multivessel disease, ULM stenosis, and CTO but similar incidence, features, and distribution of acute culprit lesion. Despite more complex PCI, revascularization is less complete.