Predictors of Social Work Practitioner Engagement in Evidence-Based Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey

被引:7
作者
Parrish, Danielle [1 ]
Lemmons, Brianna [1 ]
Washburn, Micki [2 ]
Oxhandler, Holly [1 ]
Sturdivant, Rodney [3 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Diana R Garland Sch Social Work, Houston Campus,4100 Main St, Waco, TX 77002 USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Sch Social Work, Arlington, TX USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Dept Stat Sci, Waco, TX USA
关键词
evidence-based practice; social work practice; attitudes; engagement; defining EBP; FIELD INSTRUCTORS; VALIDATION; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; VIEWS; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/26408066.2023.2168508
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Purpose: There has been a sustained effort to integrate the evidence-based practice (EBP) process within social work over the past few decades, yet it is unclear whether these efforts have increased the adoption of this process in social work practice. This study describes predictors of master's level social work practitioners' engagement in the EBP process.Method: A cross-sectional survey with NASW-Texas members (N = 258) was conducted to assess social workers' understanding, attitudes, and implementation (and perceived difficulty) of the EBP process.Results: Most respondents endorsed the multistep process definition of EBP, were favorable to EBP and viewed its application as easy or very easy. However, only 27% of the respondents reported engaging in all the steps of the EBP process often or very often. Greater years as a licensed practitioner, more positive attitudes about and less perceived difficulty with EBP predicted increased engagement.Discussion: While it appears progress may have been made compared to prior Texas NASW samples regarding views of and engagement in EBP, the discrepancy between higher engagement in specific EBP steps and engagement in the entire process is recommended for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 443
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
[51]  
Society for Social Work and Research, 2018, SSWR STRAT PLAN 2018
[52]   How to Teach Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Systematic Review [J].
Spensberger, Florian ;
Kollar, Ingo ;
Gambrill, Eileen ;
Ghanem, Christian ;
Pankofer, Sabine .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2020, 30 (01) :19-39
[53]  
Spring B, 2018, EBBP ORG
[54]  
Straus S.E., 2018, Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, V5th
[55]   Field Instructors Extending EBP Learning in Dyads (FIELD): Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Tennille, Julie ;
Solomon, Phyllis ;
Brusilovskiy, Eugene ;
Mandell, David .
JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SOCIAL WORK AND RESEARCH, 2016, 7 (01) :1-22
[56]  
Thyer B.A., 2004, BRIEF TREATMENT CRIS, V4, P167, DOI DOI 10.1093/BRIEF-TREATMENT/MHH013
[57]   Evidence-Based Practice or Evidence-Guided Practice: A Rose by Any Other Name Would Smell as Sweet [Invited Response to Gitterman & Knight's "Evidence-Guided Practice"] [J].
Thyer, Bruce A. .
FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SERVICES, 2013, 94 (02) :79-84
[58]   Evidence-Based Practices Do Not Exist [J].
Thyer, Bruce A. ;
Pignotti, Monica .
CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2011, 39 (04) :328-333
[59]   The quest for evidence-based practice: A view from the United States [J].
Thyer, Bruce A. ;
Myers, Laura L. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2011, 11 (01) :8-25
[60]   Views and Attitudes Towards Evidence-Based Practice in a Dutch Social Work Organization [J].
van der Zwet, Renske J. M. ;
Kolmer, Deirdre M. Beneken Genaamd ;
Schalk, Rene ;
Van Regenmortel, Tine .
JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED SOCIAL WORK, 2019, 16 (03) :245-260