Economic evaluation of wheelchairs interventions: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Ferretti, Eliana C. [1 ]
Suzumura, Erica [2 ]
Rozman, Luciana M. [2 ]
Cooper, Rory A. [3 ,4 ]
de Soarez, Patricia C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ciencias Movimento Humano, Santos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Med Prevent, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Human Engn Res Labs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] US Dept Vet Affairs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
wheelchair; systematic review; assistive technology; cost effectiveness; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-CARE DECISIONS; LIGHTWEIGHT WHEELCHAIRS; POWERED WHEELCHAIR; MOBILITY DEVICES; PARTICIPATION; COST; DURABILITY; SCOOTERS; PREPARE;
D O I
10.1080/17483107.2021.1993360
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The overall aim of this systematic review was to identify and synthesise the best available evidence on effectiveness, resource use and costs involved in wheelchair interventions of adults with mobility limitations. Methodology: This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Guidelines. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews. The following PICOS eligibility criteria were considered: (P) Population was individuals with mobility limitations that live in their community (e.g., non-institutionalized), with aged 18 or older; (I) Intervention was mobility assistive technologies (MAT), such as manual and powered wheelchairs; (C) Comparators (Not Applied); (O) Outcome, the primary outcome of interest, was established as the cost-effectiveness of wheelchair interventions. Direct and indirect costs per unit of effect were expressed in terms of clinical outcome units, quality-adjusted life years gained, utility scores, quality of life measures and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios to inform the economic outcomes. (S) Study design was considered as a health economic evaluation (i.e., including cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost benefit analysis as well as partial economic evaluations). The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards - CHEERS, checklist was used for summarising and interpreting the results of economic evaluations. Results: Sixteen studies were included, two were identified as full health economic evaluations and 14 were considered partial health economic evaluations. Conclusion: Only two full health economic analyses of wheelchair interventions have been conducted and both focussed on powered wheelchair provision. There are important gaps in current knowledge regarding wheelchair health economic methods and available outcome measures, which there is a great need for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1174
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Review of Economic Evidence on Community Hypertension Interventions
    Zhang, Donglan
    Wang, Guijing
    Joo, Heesoo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (06) : S121 - S130
  • [42] A Systematic Review of Workplace Ergonomic Interventions with Economic Analyses
    Emile Tompa
    Roman Dolinschi
    Claire de Oliveira
    Benjamin C. Amick
    Emma Irvin
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2010, 20 : 220 - 234
  • [43] A Systematic Review of Interventions on Patients' Social and Economic Needs
    Gottlieb, Laura M.
    Wing, Holly
    Adler, Nancy E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (05) : 719 - 729
  • [44] Economic evaluations of audit and feedback interventions: a systematic review
    Moore, Lynne
    Guertin, Jason Robert
    Tardif, Pier-Alexandre
    Ivers, Noah Michael
    Hoch, Jeffrey
    Conombo, Blanchard
    Antony, Jesmin
    Stelfox, Henry Thomas
    Berthelot, Simon
    Archambault, Patrick
    Turgeon, Alexis
    Gandhi, Rohit
    Grimshaw, J. M.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2022, 31 (10) : 754 - 767
  • [45] A Systematic Review of Workplace Ergonomic Interventions with Economic Analyses
    Tompa, Emile
    Dolinschi, Roman
    de Oliveira, Claire
    Amick, Benjamin C., III
    Irvin, Emma
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 20 (02) : 220 - 234
  • [46] Economic evaluations of psychosocial interventions in cancer: a systematic review
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Cust, Anne E.
    Kasparian, Nadine A.
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 25 (12) : 1380 - 1392
  • [47] Economic evaluations of psychosocial interventions in cancer: A systematic review
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Cust, Anne E.
    Kasparian, Nadine A.
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 25 (SP. S3) : 104 - 104
  • [48] A Systematic Review of Disability Management Interventions with Economic Evaluations
    Emile Tompa
    Claire de Oliveira
    Roman Dolinschi
    Emma Irvin
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2008, 18 : 16 - 26
  • [49] A Systematic Review of Economic Evidence of Cardiovascular Interventions in India
    Abidi, Saba
    Nair, Anandita
    Ahuja, Rakhi
    Dwivedi, Shridhar
    Talegaonkar, Sushama
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2024, 20 (06)
  • [50] A Systematic Review on Economic Evaluation Studies of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions in the Middle East and North Africa
    Nagi, Mouaddh Abdulmalik
    Dewi, Pramitha Esha Nirmala
    Thavorncharoensap, Montarat
    Sangroongruangsri, Sermsiri
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2022, 20 (03) : 315 - 335