Economic evaluation of wheelchairs interventions: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Ferretti, Eliana C. [1 ]
Suzumura, Erica [2 ]
Rozman, Luciana M. [2 ]
Cooper, Rory A. [3 ,4 ]
de Soarez, Patricia C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ciencias Movimento Humano, Santos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Med Prevent, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Human Engn Res Labs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] US Dept Vet Affairs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
wheelchair; systematic review; assistive technology; cost effectiveness; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-CARE DECISIONS; LIGHTWEIGHT WHEELCHAIRS; POWERED WHEELCHAIR; MOBILITY DEVICES; PARTICIPATION; COST; DURABILITY; SCOOTERS; PREPARE;
D O I
10.1080/17483107.2021.1993360
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The overall aim of this systematic review was to identify and synthesise the best available evidence on effectiveness, resource use and costs involved in wheelchair interventions of adults with mobility limitations. Methodology: This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Guidelines. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews. The following PICOS eligibility criteria were considered: (P) Population was individuals with mobility limitations that live in their community (e.g., non-institutionalized), with aged 18 or older; (I) Intervention was mobility assistive technologies (MAT), such as manual and powered wheelchairs; (C) Comparators (Not Applied); (O) Outcome, the primary outcome of interest, was established as the cost-effectiveness of wheelchair interventions. Direct and indirect costs per unit of effect were expressed in terms of clinical outcome units, quality-adjusted life years gained, utility scores, quality of life measures and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios to inform the economic outcomes. (S) Study design was considered as a health economic evaluation (i.e., including cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost benefit analysis as well as partial economic evaluations). The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards - CHEERS, checklist was used for summarising and interpreting the results of economic evaluations. Results: Sixteen studies were included, two were identified as full health economic evaluations and 14 were considered partial health economic evaluations. Conclusion: Only two full health economic analyses of wheelchair interventions have been conducted and both focussed on powered wheelchair provision. There are important gaps in current knowledge regarding wheelchair health economic methods and available outcome measures, which there is a great need for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1174
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review on the economic evaluation of physical activity interventions for type 2 diabetes control
    Barbosa, A.
    Whiting, S.
    Ding, M.
    Brito, J.
    Mendes, R.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 197
  • [32] Economic evaluation of physical activity interventions for type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review
    Barbosa, Ana
    Whiting, Stephen
    Ding, Ding
    Brito, Joao
    Mendes, Romeu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32 : i56 - i66
  • [33] Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies
    Alouki, Koffi
    Delisle, Helene
    Bermudez-Tamayo, Clara
    Johri, Mira
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES RESEARCH, 2016, 2016
  • [34] A systematic review of decision analytic modeling techniques for the economic evaluation of dental caries interventions
    Qu, Zhi
    Zhang, Shanshan
    Krauth, Christian
    Liu, Xuenan
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [35] Economic Evaluation for Behavioural Interventions to Prevent STIs/HIV Among Youth: A Systematic Review
    Zhang, Wen
    Wong, Janet Y. H.
    Fong, Daniel Y. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH, 2019, 31 : A322 - A322
  • [36] ECONOMIC EVALUATION STUDIES OF SELF-MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS IN CHRONIC DISEASES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    van Eeden, Mitchel
    van Heugten, Caroline M.
    van Mastrigt, Ghislaine A. P. G.
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 32 (1-2) : 16 - 28
  • [37] Economic Evaluation of Occupational Safety and Health Interventions From the Employer Perspective A Systematic Review
    Grimani, Aikaterini
    Bergstrom, Gunnar
    Casallas, Martha Isabel Riano
    Aboagye, Emmanuel
    Jensen, Irene
    Lohela-Karlsson, Malin
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 60 (02) : 147 - 166
  • [38] Economic Evaluation of Family Planning Interventions in Low and Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review
    Zakiyah, Neily
    van Asselt, Antoinette D. I.
    Roijmans, Frank
    Postma, Maarten J.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [39] Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
    Mosadeghrad, Ali Mohammad
    Jaafaripooyan, Ebrahim
    Zamandi, Mahmoud
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 51 (10) : 2159 - 2170
  • [40] A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations
    Tompa, Emile
    de Oliveira, Claire
    Dolinschi, Roman
    Irvin, Emma
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 18 (01) : 16 - 26