Economic evaluation of wheelchairs interventions: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Ferretti, Eliana C. [1 ]
Suzumura, Erica [2 ]
Rozman, Luciana M. [2 ]
Cooper, Rory A. [3 ,4 ]
de Soarez, Patricia C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ciencias Movimento Humano, Santos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Med Prevent, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Human Engn Res Labs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] US Dept Vet Affairs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
wheelchair; systematic review; assistive technology; cost effectiveness; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-CARE DECISIONS; LIGHTWEIGHT WHEELCHAIRS; POWERED WHEELCHAIR; MOBILITY DEVICES; PARTICIPATION; COST; DURABILITY; SCOOTERS; PREPARE;
D O I
10.1080/17483107.2021.1993360
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The overall aim of this systematic review was to identify and synthesise the best available evidence on effectiveness, resource use and costs involved in wheelchair interventions of adults with mobility limitations. Methodology: This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Guidelines. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews. The following PICOS eligibility criteria were considered: (P) Population was individuals with mobility limitations that live in their community (e.g., non-institutionalized), with aged 18 or older; (I) Intervention was mobility assistive technologies (MAT), such as manual and powered wheelchairs; (C) Comparators (Not Applied); (O) Outcome, the primary outcome of interest, was established as the cost-effectiveness of wheelchair interventions. Direct and indirect costs per unit of effect were expressed in terms of clinical outcome units, quality-adjusted life years gained, utility scores, quality of life measures and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios to inform the economic outcomes. (S) Study design was considered as a health economic evaluation (i.e., including cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost benefit analysis as well as partial economic evaluations). The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards - CHEERS, checklist was used for summarising and interpreting the results of economic evaluations. Results: Sixteen studies were included, two were identified as full health economic evaluations and 14 were considered partial health economic evaluations. Conclusion: Only two full health economic analyses of wheelchair interventions have been conducted and both focussed on powered wheelchair provision. There are important gaps in current knowledge regarding wheelchair health economic methods and available outcome measures, which there is a great need for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1174
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS IN CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Cust, Anne E.
    Kasparian, Nadine A.
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2015, 11 : 95 - 95
  • [2] Economic evaluation of interventions to address undernutrition: a systematic review
    Ramponi, Francesco
    Tafesse, Wiktoria
    Griffin, Susan
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2021, 36 (04) : 533 - 541
  • [3] Economic evaluation and cost of interventions for cerebral palsy: a systematic review
    Shih, Sophy T. F.
    Tonmukayakul, Utsana
    Imms, Christine
    Reddihough, Dinah
    Graham, H. Kerr
    Cox, Liz
    Carter, Rob
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2018, 60 (06): : 543 - +
  • [4] Economic evaluation of exercise interventions for individuals with cancer: A systematic review
    Wang, Yufan
    McCarthy, Alexandra L.
    Hayes, Sandra C.
    Gordon, Louisa G.
    Chiu, Vivian
    Bailey, Tom G.
    Stewart, Elizabeth
    Tuffaha, Haitham
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 172
  • [5] Systematic review of economic evaluation studies on preconception care interventions
    Kotirum, Surachai
    Kiatpongsan, Sorapop
    Kapol, Nattiya
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 42 (4-6) : 503 - 517
  • [6] Economic evaluation of lifestyle interventions in infertility management: A systematic review
    Untaaveesup, Suvijak
    Chongthanadon, Brandon
    Kositamongkol, Chayanis
    Phisalprapa, Pochamana
    Panyakhamlerd, Krasean
    Titapant, Vitaya
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [7] Economic evaluation of interventions for the treatment of asthma in children: A systematic review
    Halmai, Luca Adel
    Neilson, Aileen Rae
    Kilonzo, Mary
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) : 150 - 157
  • [8] Ear wax removal interventions: a systematic review and economic evaluation
    Loveman, Emma
    Gospodarevskaya, Elena
    Clegg, Andy
    Bryant, Jackie
    Harris, Petra
    Bird, Alex
    Scott, David A.
    Davidson, Peter
    Little, Paul
    Coppin, Richard
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2011, 61 (591): : e680 - e683
  • [9] Economic evaluation of interventions for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review
    Hannah, Laura A.
    Walsh, Cathy M.
    Jopling, Louise
    Perez, Jesus
    Cardinal, Rudolf N.
    Cameron, Rory A.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 14
  • [10] Economic Evaluation of Interventions in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review
    Afentou, Nafsika
    Jarl, Johan
    Gerdtham, Ulf-G
    Saha, Sanjib
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 6 (04): : 282 - 290