Artificial intelligence pedagogical chatbots as L2 conversational agents

被引:9
作者
Alrajhi, Assim S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Qassim Univ, Coll Languages & Humanities, Dept English Language & Literature, Qasim, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Chatbot-assisted learning; learner experience; conversational agents; learner perspective; second language interaction; LANGUAGE; EXPERIENCES; LEARNERS; BOTS;
D O I
10.1080/2331186X.2024.2327789
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper reports on a mixed-methods study delving into EFL students' experiences and perspectives on a text-based pedagogical chatbot. Utilizing chatbot-mediated interaction, a questionnaire survey, and focus group discussions, the study centers around the cognitive and affective domains of learning in relation to the chatbot's affordances and limitations. Additionally, it investigates potential associations between L2 proficiency and perceptions on the chatbot. The sample (n = 143) consisted of undergraduate students from a Saudi university who engaged in guided and self-initiated interactions with the chatbot. By and large, the findings point to positive experiences concerning the chatbot's intelligibility and comprehension. In terms of the interaction, the chatbot is perceived as supportive of L2 practice and writing development, interest-provoking, enhancing motivation, and alleviating writing anxiety. Contrastingly, certain demotivating factors are reported regarding the chatbot's interactional and instructional abilities, including the lack of extended conversations, sensitivity to inaccurate language forms, and sporadic irrelevant responses. Moreover, the Mann-Whitney U test reveals that L2 proficiency does not affect overall views on the chatbot-mediated interaction, except for the aspect of usefulness for L2 practice, which has significantly more positive views from high-intermediate students. Pedagogical implications pertinent to the integration of chatbots in L2 learning are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale [J].
Golossenko, Artyom ;
Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna ;
Aroean, Lukman .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2020, 37 (04) :737-755
[22]   Chatbots, Humbots, and the Quest for Artificial General Intelligence [J].
Grudin, Jonathan ;
Jacques, Richard .
CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
[23]  
Jin Yang Hye, 2019, [Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 멀티미디어 언어교육], V22, P184
[24]  
Kwon S K., 2023, Language Learning Technology, V27, P1
[25]  
Long M.H., 1996, HDB 2 LANGUAGE ACQUI, P413, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
[26]   Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases [J].
Luo, Xueming ;
Tong, Siliang ;
Fang, Zheng ;
Qu, Zhe .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2019, 38 (06) :937-947
[27]   Predicting the intentions to use chatbots for travel and tourism [J].
Melian-Gonzalez, Santiago ;
Gutierrez-Tano, Desiderio ;
Bulchand-Gidumal, Jacques .
CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2021, 24 (02) :192-210
[28]   What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry [J].
Pelau, Corina ;
Dabija, Dan-Cristian ;
Ene, Irina .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 122
[29]   Can machines talk? Comparison of Eliza with modern dialogue systems [J].
Shah, Huma ;
Warwick, Kevin ;
Vallverdu, Jordi ;
Wu, Defeng .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 58 :278-295
[30]  
Shin Dongkwang, 2021, [Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 영어학], V21, P375