Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 and reference denosumab in healthy males

被引:5
作者
Vogg, Barbara [1 ]
Poetzl, Johann [1 ]
El Galta, Rachid [1 ]
Fuhr, Rainard [2 ]
Schwebig, Arnd [1 ]
Sekhar, Susmit [1 ]
机构
[1] Hexal AG, Clin Dev Biopharmaceut, Industriestr 25, D-83607 Holzkirchen, Germany
[2] Parexel Int GmbH, Early Phase Clin Unit, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Biosimilar; denosumab; GP2411; immunogenicity; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; phase I; safety; BONE TURNOVER MARKERS; MEN;
D O I
10.1080/14712598.2024.2308645
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: This Phase I study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity of GP2411 proposed denosumab biosimilar to reference denosumab (a monoclonal antibody for specific pro-resorptive conditions). Research design and methods: Healthy males (28-65 years, 50-90 kg) were randomized to a single sub-therapeutic subcutaneous injection of 35 mg GP2411, EU-Xgeva (R) or US-Xgeva (R), and followed for 39 weeks. The primary endpoints were AUC(inf), AUC(last), and C-max. Results: Four hundred ninety-two participants completed treatment. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) (AUC(inf), AUC(last), and C-max) and 95% CI of the geometric mean ratios of AUEC of % change from baseline in serum CTX were fully contained within the prespecified equivalence margins (0.80, 1.25), demonstrating similarity. The occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with GP2411, EU-Xgeva (R) and US-Xgeva (R) was similar (72.9%, 76.0%, and 71.0% of participants, respectively). Most were Grade 1 or 2, <30% were treatment-related, and there was only one TEAE-related study discontinuation. Rates of positive anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were similar (57.8%, 64.9%, and 69.1% of participants respectively), but immunogenicity was only borderline detectable and of very low magnitude. Ninety-nine percent of positive ADAs were transient. Conclusion: GP2411 demonstrated similarity with EU-Xgeva (R) and US-Xgeva (R) in PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Amgen Inc, 2020, XGEV US PI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Bioanalytical method validation - guidance for industry [Internet]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product Guidance for Industry
[4]   Key Triggers of Osteoclast-Related Diseases and Available Strategies for Targeted Therapies: A Review [J].
Bi, Haidi ;
Chen, Xing ;
Gao, Song ;
Yu, Xiaolong ;
Xiao, Jun ;
Zhang, Bin ;
Liu, Xuqiang ;
Dai, Min .
FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 4
[5]   Effects of Denosumab on Bone Turnover Markers in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis [J].
Eastell, Richard ;
Christiansen, Claus ;
Grauer, Andreas ;
Kutilek, Stepan ;
Libanati, Cesar ;
McClung, Michael R. ;
Reid, Ian R. ;
Resch, Heinrich ;
Siris, Ethel ;
Uebelhart, Daniel ;
Wang, Andrea ;
Weryha, Georges ;
Cummings, Steve R. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2011, 26 (03) :530-537
[6]   The hidden secrets of soluble RANKL in bone biology [J].
Elango, Jeevithan ;
Bao, Bin ;
Wu, Wenhui .
CYTOKINE, 2021, 144
[7]  
EMA, 2016, XGEV EU SMPC
[8]  
EMA, 2020, PROL EU SMPC
[9]  
EMA, 2023, ICH GUID M10 BIOAN M
[10]  
European Medicines Agency, 2014, GUID SIM BIOL MED PR