The effect of anticipated telework conditions and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on work-family outcomes

被引:1
作者
Huynh, Tiffany [1 ]
McDonald, Janet L. [1 ]
Smith, Rachel Williamson [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Georgia Southern Univ, Parker Coll Business, POB 8151, Statesboro, GA USA
关键词
Telework; Family-supportive supervisor behaviors; Anticipated work-family conflict; Workplace telepressure; COMMON METHOD BIAS; FLEXIBLE WORKING; CONFLICT; HOME; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-024-05675-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
With the lasting impact of the shift to telework due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential that organizations understand the effects of teleworking and family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs) on important work-family outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the causal implications that formal vs. informal telework arrangements and FSSBs have on anticipated work-family conflict (AWFC) and workplace telepressure. A sample of undergraduate students read two vignettes manipulating telework arrangements (formal/informal) and amount of FSSBs (high/low), then responded to outcome measures through a survey. The informal teleworking arrangement was hypothesized to result in higher AWFC and workplace telepressure than the formal teleworking arrangement. The high FSSBs condition was posited to result in lower AWFC and workplace telepressure than the low FSSBs condition. An interaction was expected in both dependent variables, such that ratings would be particularly high when teleworking was informal and FSSBs were low. In our sample, we found no main effect of formal vs. informal teleworking arrangement, partial evidence for the hypothesized main effect of FSSBs, and some evidence for the interaction between the two. Implications for managerial training and organizational teleworking policies are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:17065 / 17078
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Gottfredson, Ryan K. ;
Joo, Harry .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (02) :270-301
[2]  
Anderson Lydia, 2023, Share of One -Person Households More Than Tripled from 1940 to 2020
[3]   Workplace telepressure and work-life balance outcomes: The role of work recovery experiences [J].
Barber, Larissa K. ;
Conlin, Amanda L. ;
Santuzzi, Alecia M. .
STRESS AND HEALTH, 2019, 35 (03) :350-362
[4]   Please Respond ASAP: Workplace Telepressure and Employee Recovery [J].
Barber, Larissa K. ;
Santuzzi, Alecia M. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 20 (02) :172-189
[5]   The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict [J].
Boswell, Wendy R. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2007, 33 (04) :592-610
[6]   AGE-DIFFERENCES IN WORK MOTIVATION AND JOB SATISFACTION. THE INFLUENCE OF AGE ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN WORK CHARACTERISTICS AND WORKERS' OUTCOMES [J].
Boumans, Nicolle P. G. ;
de Jong, Ad H. J. ;
Janssen, Sara M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 73 (04) :331-350
[7]   A review of research methods in IO/OB work-family research [J].
Casper, Wendy J. ;
Eby, Lillian T. ;
Bordeaux, Christopher ;
Lockwood, Angie ;
Lambert, Dawn .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (01) :28-43
[8]   The Jingle-Jangle of Work-Nonwork Balance: A Comprehensive and Meta-Analytic Review of Its Meaning and Measurement [J].
Casper, Wendy J. ;
Vaziri, Hoda ;
Wayne, Julie Holliday ;
DeHauw, Sara ;
Greenhaus, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 103 (02) :182-214
[9]  
Chambliss D.F., 2018, MAKING SENSE SOCIAL
[10]   Anticipated work-family conflict: Effects of gender, self-efficacy, and family background [J].
Cinamon, RG .
CAREER DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2006, 54 (03) :202-215