Endovascular Revascularisation versus Open Surgery with Prosthetic Bypass for Femoro-Popliteal Lesions in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

被引:4
|
作者
Zenunaj, Gladiol [1 ]
Acciarri, Pierfilippo [1 ]
Baldazzi, Giulia [2 ]
Cosacco, Alessio Mario [2 ]
Gasbarro, Vincenzo [1 ,2 ]
Traina, Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ferrara, Unit Vasc & Endovasc Surg, I-44124 Ferrara, Italy
[2] Univ Ferrara, Sch Vasc Surg, Dept Translat Med Romagna, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy
关键词
endovascular procedures; femoral popliteal bypass; peripheral arterial disease; prosthetic graft; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL-ARTERY; DRUG-COATED BALLOON; NITINOL STENTS; ANGIOPLASTY; ISCHEMIA; OUTCOMES; VEIN; IMPLANTATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12185978
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: Complex atherosclerotic femoro-popliteal lesions have traditionally been treated with bypass surgery. A prosthetic graft is used to save the vein graft for more distal revascularisations or when a vein graft is unavailable. The endovascular approach has gained popularity and is offered as a first-line strategy for complex lesions. This study aimed to evaluate whether endovascular procedures can be used as a first-line treatment strategy for complex native femoro-popliteal lesions over open surgery with prosthetic bypass in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods: This single-centre retrospective observational study was conducted between 2013 and 2021; it included patients with symptomatic PAD who required limb revascularisation at the femoro-popliteal segment and who had complex lesions. The primary endpoints analysed were technical success, primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (cdTLR), freedom from major adverse limb and cardiovascular events (MALE and MACE, respectively), freedom from limb loss, and survival. The secondary endpoints were length of in-hospital stay, and duration and costs of the procedure. Results: We identified 185 limbs among 174 suitable candidates for comparison, wherein 105 were treated with an endovascular procedure and 80 with a femoro-popliteal prosthetic bypass. Most patients in both groups presented with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia, and >90% of them had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of >3. The endovascular group had more octogenarians (p = 0.02) and patients with coronary disease (p = 0.004). The median follow-up was 30 months. The technical failure rate for endovascular procedures was 4.7%, versus 0% in the open group (p = 0.047). Freedom from MACE was similar in both groups. The endovascular group showed superior primary patency (p < 0.0001), cdTLR (p < 0.0001), MALE (p < 0.0001), and freedom from limb loss (p = 0.0018) at 24 and 48 months. Further analysis performed for the open above-the-knee sub-group showed that the aforementioned endpoints were similar between the groups at 12 months and were better in the endovascular group at 24 and 48 months. Procedural time and in-hospital stay were longer in the open group than in the endovascular group (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The procedural cost in the endovascular group was 10-fold lower than that in the prosthetic bypass group. Conclusions: Endovascular procedures are safe for treating complex femoro-popliteal lesions in patients at a high risk for surgery and show better outcomes at 24 months than prosthetic bypasses do. The latter may be considered as an alternative should endovascular treatment fail.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease of the femoro-popliteal arteries
    Vos, Cornelis G. G.
    Vahl, Anco C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 59 (02) : 164 - 171
  • [2] The role of circulating miRNAs as predictive biomarkers for the neointimal hyperplasia after femoro-popliteal endovascular procedures for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease
    Zenunaj, Gladiol
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 30 (04): : 120 - 126
  • [3] Endovascular management of ruptured anastomotic pseudoaneurysm at the distal end of a prosthetic femoro-popliteal bypass: a "quick and easy fix"
    Karkos, C. D.
    Giagtzidis, I. T.
    Kalogirou, T. E.
    Christoforou, P.
    Papazoglou, K. O.
    HIPPOKRATIA, 2015, 19 (02) : 179 - 181
  • [4] Endovascular Versus Open Revascularization for Peripheral Arterial Disease
    Wiseman, Jason T.
    Fernandes-Taylor, Sara
    Saha, Sandeep
    Havlena, Jeffrey
    Rathouz, Paul J.
    Smith, Maureen A.
    Kent, K. Craig
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (02) : 424 - 430
  • [5] COMPARISON OF ABOVE-THE-KNEE PROSTHETIC FEMORO-POPLITEAL BYPASS VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY AND STENTING FOR TREATMENT OF OCCLUSIVE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY DISEASE
    Linnakoski, H.
    Uurto, I.
    Suominen, V.
    Vakhitov, D.
    Salenius, J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 102 (04) : 227 - 233
  • [6] Comparing the Benefit of Duplex Ultrasound Surveillance Following Both Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery and Stenting for Femoro-Popliteal Disease
    Dar, Than
    Li, Lanxin
    Basra, Melvinder
    Crockett, Stephen
    Chowdhury, Mohammed M.
    Zielinski, Lukasz Piotr
    Ambler, Graeme K.
    Coughlin, Patrick A.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 57 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [7] Evolution of patency rates of self-expandable bare metal stents for endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal arterial occlusive disease: Does stent design matter?
    Treitl, Karla Maria
    Woerner, Benedikt
    Schinner, Regina
    Czihal, Michael
    Notohamiprodjo, Susan
    Hoffmann, Ulrich
    Treitl, Marcus
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (09) : 3947 - 3955
  • [8] Acute limb ischemia after occluded femoro-popliteal stents: a comparative analysis between endovascular revascularization vs. open bypass (FOCUS Study)
    Bertagna, Giulia
    Troisi, Nicola
    D'oria, Mario
    Gargiulo, Mauro
    Antonello, Michele
    Pratesi, Giovanni
    Michelagnoli, Stefano
    Silingardi, Roberto
    Isernia, Giacomo
    Veraldi, Gian Franco
    Tinelli, Giovanni
    Giudice, Rocco
    Ippoliti, Arnaldo
    Cappiello, Pierluigi
    Martelli, Massimiliano
    Lepidi, Sandro
    Berchiolli, Raffaella
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [9] Amputation-Free Survival in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Arterial Disease With Heel Ulcer: Open Versus Endovascular Surgery
    Butt, Talha
    Lilja, Erika
    Orneholm, Hedvig
    Apelqvist, Jan
    Gottsater, Anders
    Eneroth, Magnus
    Acosta, Stefan
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 53 (02) : 118 - 125
  • [10] Amputation-free survival in patients with diabetic foot ulcer and peripheral arterial disease: Endovascular versus open surgery in a propensity score adjusted analysis
    Butt, Talha
    Lilja, Erika
    Elgzyri, Targ
    Apelqvist, Jan
    Gottsater, Anders
    Engstrom, Gunnar
    Acosta, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2020, 34 (05)