Clinician survey of current global practice for sarcoma surveillance following resection of primary retroperitoneal, abdominal, and pelvic sarcoma

被引:0
|
作者
Maes, Danielle [1 ]
McMullan, Christel [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Ford, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Inst Hlth & Care Res NIHR SRMRC, Birmingham, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[5] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr BRC, Birmingham B15 2TH, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Blood & Transplant Res Unit BTRU Precis Trans, Birmingham, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Appl Res Collaborat ARC West Midlands, Birmingham, England
[8] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Hlth Partners Ctr Regulatory Sci & Inno, Birmingham, England
来源
EJSO | 2023年 / 49卷 / 11期
关键词
Sarcoma; Abdomen; Pelvis; Aftercare; Surveillance; Standards; SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS; DISEASE-FREE; SURVIVAL; RECURRENCE; STRATEGIES; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; INTENSITY; RPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107085
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: - Postoperative surveillance following resection of primary retroperitoneal, abdominal, and pelvic sarcoma (RPS) is standard of care in international sarcoma centres and has rapidly evolved without an evidence base to become highly intensive and prolonged. This clinician survey aims to capture a global, contemporary snapshot of international guidelines used to inform sarcoma surveillance following resection of primary RPS.Materials and methods: - Between July 2022 and March 2023, an online, anonymous, clinician survey to assess the current duration, imaging intervals and imaging modalities used for postoperative surveillance following resection of primary RPS was distributed among clinicians working at centres which are members of the TransAtlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Working Group (TARPSWG).Results: - Responses were received from 58 different TARPSWG centres. The majority of centres use institutional guidelines to guide surveillance intensity (n = 43, 74%) and the surveillance imaging modality (n = 39, 67%) used. For surveillance intensity and imaging modality, institutional guidelines are partially or entirely based on international guidelines in 81% (n = 47) and 78% (n = 45) of centres, respectively. Commonly used imaging modalities are contrast-enhanced CT abdomen-pelvis (n = 51, 88%) for abdominal surveillance and non-contrast enhanced CT (n = 25, 43%) for chest surveillance. Imaging intervals, timing of de-escalation of imaging fre-quency and total duration of surveillance for low-grade and high-grade RPS are reported.Conclusion: - This global survey among TARPSWG members demonstrates the heterogeneity in sarcoma sur-veillance strategies worldwide and emphasises the need for a randomised controlled trial to provide an evidence base for the optimal surveillance schedule following primary resection of RPS.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [31] Patients Regularly Return to Medium- and Low-Impact Types of Sporting Activities Following Distal Femoral or Proximal Tibial Replacement After Resection of a Primary Bone Sarcoma
    Westphal, Lucia M.
    Theil, Christoph
    Gosheger, Georg
    Ellerbrock, Moritz
    Deventer, Niklas
    Schneider, Kristian N.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (12): : 3046 - 3055
  • [32] Determining functional outcomes after resection and reconstruction of primary soft tissue sarcoma in the lower extremity: A review of current subjective and objective measurement systems
    Wiffen, James
    Mah, Eldon
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 127 (05) : 862 - 870
  • [33] Low Hartmann's procedure or intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection in the primary treatment of low rectal cancer; a survey among surgeons evaluating current practice
    Westerduin, Emma
    Westerterp, Marinke
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    van Geloven, Anna A.
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2019, 119 (02) : 132 - 136