Comparison of PlanetScope, Sentinel-2, and landsat 8 data in soybean yield estimation within-field variability with random forest regression

被引:6
|
作者
Amankulova, Khilola [1 ,3 ]
Farmonov, Nizom [1 ]
Akramova, Parvina [2 ]
Tursunov, Ikrom [2 ]
Mucsi, Laszlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Dept Geoinformat Phys & Environm Geog, Egyet Utca 2, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
[2] TIIAME NRU Bukhara Inst Nat Resources Management, Dept Hydrol & Ecol, Gazli Ave 32, Bukhara, Uzbekistan
[3] Egyet utca 2, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
关键词
Soybean yield; Remote sensing; PlanetScope; Sentinel-2; Landsat; 8; Random forest; CROP YIELD; VEGETATION; WHEAT; PREDICTION; SATELLITE; CORN;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17432
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Accurate timely and early-season crop yield estimation within the field variability is important for precision farming and sustainable management applications. Therefore, the ability to estimate the within-field variability of grain yield is crucial for ensuring food security worldwide, especially under climate change. Several Earth observation systems have thus been developed to monitor crops and predict yields. Despite this, new research is required to combine multiplatform data integration, advancements in satellite technologies, data processing, and the application of this discipline to agricultural practices. This study provides further developments in soybean yield estimation by comparing multisource satellite data from PlanetScope (PS), Sentinel-2 (S2), and Landsat 8 (L8) and introducing topographic and meteorological variables. Herein, a new method of combining soybean yield, global positioning systems, harvester data, climate, topographic variables, and remote sensing images has been demonstrated. Soybean yield shape points were obtained from a combine-harvester-installed GPS and yield monitoring system from seven fields over the 2021 season. The yield estimation models were trained and validated using random forest, and four vegetation indices were tested. The result showed that soybean yield can be accurately predicted at 3-, 10-, and 30-m resolutions with mean absolute error (MAE) value of 0.091 t/ha for PS, 0.118 t/ha for S2, and 0.120 t/ha for L8 data (root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.111, 0.076). The combination of the environmental data with the original bands provided further improvements and an accurate yield estimation model within the soybean yield variability with MAE of 0.082 t/ha for PS, 0.097 t/ha for S2, and 0.109 t/ha for L8 (RMSE of 0.094, 0.069, and 0.108 t/ha). The results showed that the optimal date to predict the soybean yield within the field scale was approximately 60 or 70 days before harvesting periods during the beginning bloom stage. The developed model can be applied for other crops and locations when suitable training yield data, which are critical for precision farming, are available.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing within-Field Corn and Soybean Yield Variability from WorldView-3, Planet, Sentinel-2, and Landsat 8 Satellite Imagery
    Skakun, Sergii
    Kalecinski, Natacha I.
    Brown, Meredith G. L.
    Johnson, David M.
    Vermote, Eric F.
    Roger, Jean-Claude
    Franch, Belen
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 18
  • [2] Within-Field Rice Yield Estimation Based on Sentinel-2 Satellite Data
    Franch, Belen
    San Bautista, Alberto
    Fita, David
    Rubio, Constanza
    Tarrazo-Serrano, Daniel
    Sanchez, Antonio
    Skakun, Sergii
    Vermote, Eric
    Becker-Reshef, Inbal
    Uris, Antonio
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [3] Predicting within-field soybean yield variability by coupling Sentinel-2 leaf area index with a crop growth model
    Gaso, Deborah, V
    de Wit, Allard
    Berger, Andres G.
    Kooistra, Lammert
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2021, 308
  • [4] Studying the Feasibility of Assimilating Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope Imagery into the SAFY Crop Model to Predict Within-Field Wheat Yield
    Manivasagam, V. S.
    Sadeh, Yuval
    Kaplan, Gregoriy
    Bonfil, David J.
    Rozenstein, Offer
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [5] Monitoring Within-Field Variability of Corn Yield using Sentinel-2 and Machine Learning Techniques
    Kayad, Ahmed
    Sozzi, Marco
    Gatto, Simone
    Marinello, Francesco
    Pirotti, Francesco
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (23)
  • [6] Farming and Earth Observation: Sentinel-2 data to estimate within-field wheat grain yield
    Segarra, Joel
    Araus, Jose Luis C.
    Kefauver, Shawn C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2022, 107
  • [7] Combining PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 images with environmental data for improved wheat yield estimation
    Farmonov, Nizom
    Amankulova, Khilola
    Szatmari, Jozsef
    Urinov, Jamol
    Narmanov, Zafar
    Nosirov, Jakhongir
    Mucsi, Laszlo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2023, 16 (01) : 847 - 867
  • [8] In-season forecasting of within-field grain yield from Sentinel-2 time series data
    Amin, Eatidal
    Pipia, Luca
    Belda, Santiago
    Perich, Gregor
    Graf, Lukas Valentin
    Aasen, Helge
    Van Wittenberghe, Shari
    Moreno, Jose
    Verrelst, Jochem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2024, 126
  • [9] Strategies for monitoring within-field soybean yield using Sentinel-2 Vis-NIR-SWIR spectral bands and machine learning regression methods
    L. G.T. Crusiol
    Liang Sun
    R. N.R. Sibaldelli
    V. Felipe Junior
    W. X. Furlaneti
    R. Chen
    Z. Sun
    D. Wuyun
    Z. Chen
    M. R. Nanni
    R. H. Furlanetto
    E. Cezar
    A. L. Nepomuceno
    J. R.B. Farias
    Precision Agriculture, 2022, 23 : 1093 - 1123
  • [10] Strategies for monitoring within-field soybean yield using Sentinel-2 Vis-NIR-SWIR spectral bands and machine learning regression methods
    Crusiol, L. G. T.
    Sun, Liang
    Sibaldelli, R. N. R.
    Felipe Junior, V
    Furlaneti, W. X.
    Chen, R.
    Sun, Z.
    Wuyun, D.
    Chen, Z.
    Nanni, M. R.
    Furlanetto, R. H.
    Cezar, E.
    Nepomuceno, A. L.
    Farias, J. R. B.
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2022, 23 (03) : 1093 - 1123