Cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Liang, Xueyan [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Li, Huijuan [1 ]
Li, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peoples Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg, Dept Pharm, Nanning, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
aNSCLC; cemiplimab plus chemotherapy; chemotherapy; cost-effectiveness; partitioned survival model; FINANCIAL TOXICITY; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; STAGE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1113374
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), cemiplimab plus chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) significantly compared to chemotherapy alone. The cost-effectiveness of these drugs is still uncertain. The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy for the treatment of aNSCLC from the third-party payer perspective in the United States. Materials and methodsThe cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for the treatment of aNSCLC was evaluated using a partitioned survival model containing three mutually incompatible health states. The clinical characteristics and outcomes used in the model were gathered from EMPOWER-Lung 3 trial. We have conducted deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis in order to evaluate the robustness of the model. The primary outcomes considered were the costs, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net health benefits (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMB). ResultsTreatment of aNSCLC with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy increased efficacy by 0.237 QALYs and was associated with an increased total cost of $50,796 compared to chemotherapy alone, resulting in an ICER of $214,256/QALY gained. At a WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY, the INHB of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy was 0.203 QALYs and the INMB was $304,704 compared to chemotherapy alone. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that there was only a 0.04% chance that cemiplimab with chemotherapy would be cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY. The performance of model was mainly determined by the price of cemiplimab, according to a one-way sensitivity analysis. ConclusionsFrom the third-party payer perspective, cemiplimab combined chemotherapy is unlikely to be a cost-effective option for the treatment of aNSCLC at the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY in the United States.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China
    Shang, Fangjian
    Zhang, Boyuan
    Kang, Shuo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (03) : 337 - 343
  • [22] Economic evaluation of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy regimen for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Yitian Lang
    Yan Lin
    Meng Deng
    Xiaoyan Liu
    BMC Cancer, 24
  • [23] Toripalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Huo, Gengwei
    Liu, Wenjie
    Kang, Shuo
    Chen, Peng
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [24] Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combined with Two Cycles of Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Ye Peng
    Xiaohui Zeng
    Liubao Peng
    Qiao Liu
    Lidan Yi
    Xia Luo
    Sini Li
    Liting Wang
    Shuxia Qin
    Xiaomin Wan
    Chongqing Tan
    Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 3962 - 3972
  • [25] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs. Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Hu, Huabin
    She, Longjiang
    Liao, Mengting
    Shi, Yin
    Yao, Linli
    Ding, Dong
    Zhu, Youwen
    Zeng, Shan
    Carbone, David P.
    Huang, Jin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [26] Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combined with Two Cycles of Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Peng, Ye
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Peng, Liubao
    Liu, Qiao
    Yi, Lidan
    Luo, Xia
    Li, Sini
    Wang, Liting
    Qin, Shuxia
    Wan, Xiaomin
    Tan, Chongqing
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (07) : 3962 - 3972
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of Kang Ai injection plus chemotherapy vs. Shenqi Fuzheng injection plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Zhu, Junjie
    Tian, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [28] A Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China
    Li, Xinyan
    Li, Weichen
    Hou, Lingping
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2019, 18 : 1 - 7
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy combinations with or without chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a modelling approach
    Hui, Wen
    Song, Ruomeng
    Tao, Hongyu
    Gao, Zhixiang
    Zhu, Min
    Zhang, Mingyue
    Wu, Huazhang
    Gong, Daichen
    Zhang, Xiyan
    Cai, Yuanyi
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [30] Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy combinations with or without chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a modelling approach
    Bullement, Ash
    Edmondson-Jones, Mark
    Latimer, Nicholas
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)