A design framework for a system of digital twins and services

被引:26
作者
Human, C. [1 ]
Basson, A. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kruger, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Mech & Mechatron Engn, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Design framework; Complex system; Digital twin; Aggregation; Service-oriented architecture; SMART CITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.compind.2022.103796
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Digital twins represent physical systems in virtual space to enable knowledge intensive tasks. For complex physical systems, effective digital integration can often be achieved by means of a system of aggregated digital twins coupled with a services network. Designing such a system of digital twins and services involves a daunting array of options and considerations. This paper presents a design framework that facilitates systematic, effective decisions when designing a system of digital twins to integrate the data from a complex physical system. The design framework is arranged in six steps: 1) needs and constraints analysis, 2) physical system decomposition, 3) services allocation, 4) performance and quality considerations, 5) implementation considerations and 6) veri-fication and validation. The design framework works with a general reference architecture that combines a digital twin aggregation hierarchy with a service-oriented architecture. This reference architecture allows for the separation of concerns, computational load distribution, incremental development and modular software design. The paper considers the merits of the design framework using two illustrative case studies, i.e. a heliostat field and a smart city. The case studies indicate that the design framework can be applied to a wide range of complex systems and can improve the effectiveness of the design process.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Adolphs D.P., 2015, RAMI40
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, IV PROJ FACTS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 247652010E ISOIECIEE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, The Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Journal of big data, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40537-015-0028-X, DOI 10.1186/S40537-015-0034-Z]
[6]  
Bekker A, 2018, MARINE DESIGN XIII, VOLS 1 & 2, P135
[7]  
Berrone P., 2018, IESE cities in motion index
[8]  
CDBB, 2018, Gemini principles
[9]  
Ciavotta Michele, 2018, 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS). Proceedings, P702, DOI 10.1109/ICPHYS.2018.8390793
[10]  
Ciavotta M, 2020, MICROSERVICES: SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-31646-4_11