"Victims of feminism": exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere

被引:39
作者
Dickel, Valerie [1 ]
Evolvi, Giulia [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hist Culture & Commun, Dept Media & Commun, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Manosphere; networked misogyny; #MeToo; popular feminism; hate speech; ONLINE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1080/14680777.2022.2029925
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The manosphere is a detached set of websites and social media groups united by the belief that men are oppressed victims of feminism. Even though the manosphere has existed since the early 2000s, its activities have been arguably influenced and increased by the perceived need for counterbalancing the growth of online feminist discourses, such as those conveyed by #MeToo. By applying the theoretical lens of networked misogyny, this article explores the following research question: How is the #MeToo debate framed and discussed in the manosphere? The question is addressed through a qualitative thematic analysis of 12 articles and 641 comments about #MeToo written on the websites Return of Kings and A Voice for Men, which are part of the groups Pick-Up Artists and Men's Right Movement, respectively. The analysis highlights some dominant themes: first, criticism and verbal abuse against women; second, dismissal of rape and description of #MeToo as a feminist conspiracy; third, perceived victimization of men and a desire to reestablish patriarchal values. This suggests that the manosphere is not a homogeneous network but a cluster of misogynist networks characterized by different viewpoints and degrees of violence, and entangled with racist, homophobic, and far-right ideologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1392 / 1408
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Phallic Affect, or Why Men's Rights Activists Have Feelings [J].
Allan, Jonathan A. .
MEN AND MASCULINITIES, 2016, 19 (01) :22-41
[2]  
[Anonymous], MAL SUPR
[3]   Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism [J].
Baer, Hester .
FEMINIST MEDIA STUDIES, 2016, 16 (01) :17-34
[4]   Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation [J].
Banet-Weiser, Sarah ;
Gill, Rosalind ;
Rottenberg, Catherine .
FEMINIST THEORY, 2020, 21 (01) :3-24
[5]   #MasculinitySoFragile: culture, structure, and networked misogyny [J].
Banet-Weiser, Sarah ;
Miltner, Kate M. .
FEMINIST MEDIA STUDIES, 2016, 16 (01) :171-174
[6]   "Newsrooms need the metoo movement." Sexism and the press in Kenya, South Africa, and Nigeria [J].
Blumell, Lindsey E. ;
Mulupi, Dinfin .
FEMINIST MEDIA STUDIES, 2021, 21 (04) :639-656
[7]   How Young Users Deal With Multiple Platforms: The Role of Meaning-Making in Social Media Repertoires [J].
Boczkowski, Pablo J. ;
Matassi, Mora ;
Mitchelstein, Eugenia .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2018, 23 (05) :245-259
[8]  
BOYLE K, 2019, FEM MEDIA STUD, V20, P1
[9]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352
[10]   What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech? [J].
Brown, Alexander .
ETHNICITIES, 2018, 18 (03) :297-326