Multi-method combined analysis of urban flood risks and its influencing factors under low impact development

被引:9
作者
Zhao, Lidong [1 ]
Li, Jianzhu [1 ]
Zhang, Ting [1 ]
Feng, Ping [1 ]
Wang, Xinze [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shen, Jian [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Intelligent Constructio, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Observat & Res Stn Erhai Lake Ecosyst Yunnan, Dali 671000, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Yunnan Dali Res Inst, Dali 671000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Urban floods; Low impact development; Reduction effect; Flood risk; Influencing factors; INUNDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130927
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In previous studies, the mitigation of urban floods via low impact development (LID) has typically been expressed only in terms of runoff volume reduction. The impact of duration time and flow velocity on the flood risk has not been quantitatively analyzed. This paper takes the Beiyangyuan Campus of Tianjin University (national pilot sponge campus) as the study area. Based on the constructed SWMM and MIKE21 coupled model, the effects of LID on different flood characteristics are analyzed by setting LID removal scenarios. The results show that LID mainly mitigates urban floods by reducing the runoff volume, inundation area and risk area, and the reduction effect is approximately 15%-38%. The water depth, flow velocity and duration time are not sensitive to LID practices, and the reduction effect is basically below 10%. The flood risk and its influencing factors in the study area were analyzed using combined multi-methods based on water depth (WD), water depth & duration time (WD&DT), and hazard rating (HR). The results show that the central island with numerous LID practices has an almost undetected flood risk, and the high risk is mainly distributed in the northeast of the study area. Duration time is an important influencing factor on flood risk, and after adding consideration of duration time, the proportion of risk levels upgraded to moderate or high is more than 90%. Further analysis shows that insufficient drainage capacity of the pipe network leads to prolonged ponding, which is the primary cause of flood risk in the study area. Adding the consideration of flow velocity, the 27-36% low-risk area changes to moderate risk; multiple linear regression analysis shows that the contribution of flow velocity to the flood risk is minimal. The possibility of flow impact hazard in the study area is very low, and the cumulative frequency of water depth and flow velocity product (d & sdot;v) less than 0.04 m2/s is more than 98% in each scenario.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Modeling flood reduction effects of low impact development at a watershed scale [J].
Ahiablame, Laurent ;
Shakya, Ranish .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 171 :81-91
[2]   Managing flooding: from a problem to an opportunity [J].
Ashley, Richard ;
Gersonius, Berry ;
Horton, Bruce .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2020, 378 (2168)
[3]   1D/2Dstormwater modelling to support urban flood risk management in estuarine areas: Hazard assessment in the Dafundo case study [J].
Cardoso, Maria Adriana ;
Almeida, Maria Ceu ;
Brito, Rita S. ;
Gomes, Joao L. ;
Beceiro, Paula ;
Oliveira, Anabela .
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (04)
[4]  
Cox R.J., 2010, AUSTR RAINFALL RUNOF
[5]   Using AHP-PROMOTHEE for Selection of Best Low-Impact Development Designs for Urban Flood Mitigation [J].
Dadrasajirlou, Yashar ;
Karami, Hojat ;
Mirjalili, Seyedali .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (01) :375-402
[6]  
Defra, 2008, Flood and Coastal Defence Appraisal Guidance, Social Appraisal, Supplementary Note to Operating Authorities: Assessing and Valuing the Risk to Life from Flooding for Use in Appraisal of Risk Management Measures
[7]  
DHI, 2023, MIKE 21 Flow Model: Scientific Documentation
[8]  
Feng P., 2001, J. Hydraul. Eng., V8, P64
[9]  
Fisher H., 2007, 2 NAT LOW IMP DEV C
[10]  
Foster D.N., 1973, STABILITY CHILDREN R