Evaluation of the Effect of Digital Dentistry on the Accuracy of Implant Placement and Prosthesis Fabrication-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Reddy, Naveen [1 ]
Vempalli, Swetha [2 ]
Prakash, Jayant [3 ]
Suganna, Mahesh [4 ]
Meenakshi, Srinivasa Iyer [5 ]
Shivakumar, Ganiga Channaiah [6 ]
Crimi, Salvatore [7 ]
Minervini, Giuseppe [8 ]
机构
[1] Jazan Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Jizan 82847, Saudi Arabia
[2] Jazan Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Jazan 82847, Saudi Arabia
[3] Sadar Hosp, Muzaffarpur 842001, Bihar, India
[4] Riyadh Elm Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia
[5] JSS Acad Higher Educ & Res, JSS Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont & Crown & Bridge, Mysuru 570015, India
[6] Peoples Univ, Peoples Coll Dent Sci & Res Ctr, Dept Oral Med & Radiol, Bhopal 462037, India
[7] Catania Univ, Dept Biomed & Surg & Biomed Sci, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[8] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Multidisciplinary Dept Med Surg & Odontostomatol S, I-80121 Naples, Italy
来源
PROSTHESIS | 2023年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
digital dentistry; implant placement; prosthesis fabrication; systematic review; meta-analysis; accuracy; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; FIXED PROSTHODONTICS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; PRECISION; SCANNER; CASTS;
D O I
10.3390/prosthesis5030047
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; R318.08 [生物材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080501 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Digital dentistry has gained significant attention in recent years due to its potential to improve the accuracy of implant placement and prosthesis fabrication. However, the literature on its effectiveness remains controversial, and a systematic review and meta-analysis are necessary to evaluate the available evidence. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple online databases using MeSH keywords and Boolean operators. Data extraction was performed, and a bias assessment was conducted based on modified CONSORT guidelines. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were then calculated. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of implant placement and prosthesis fabrication between digital and conventional techniques (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.23 and RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.23). Subgroup analysis based on individual studies did not demonstrate consistent results. This review suggests that digital techniques do not significantly impact the accuracy of implant placement and prosthesis fabrication compared to conventional techniques in an in vitro setting. However, the overall evidence is limited by the small number of studies and the heterogeneity observed. Future well-designed studies, including randomized controlled trials and clinical studies, are needed to provide more robust evidence on the effectiveness of digital dentistry in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 677
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The Influence of Digital Fabrication Options on the Accuracy of Dental Implant-Based Single Units and Complete-Arch Frameworks [J].
Abdel-Azim, Tamer ;
Zandinejad, Amirali ;
Elathamna, Eiad ;
Lin, Weishao ;
Morton, Dean .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (06) :1281-1288
[2]   A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years [J].
Aglietta, Marco ;
Siciliano, Vincenzo Iorio ;
Zwahlen, Marcel ;
Braegger, Urs ;
Pjetursson, Biarni E. ;
Lang, Niklaus P. ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (05) :441-451
[3]   Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review [J].
Ahlholm, Pekka ;
Sipila, Kirsi ;
Vallittu, Pekka ;
Jakonen, Minna ;
Kotiranta, Ulla .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (01) :35-41
[4]   Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type [J].
Alikhasi, Marzieh ;
Siadat, Hakime ;
Nasirpour, Alireza ;
Hasanzade, Mahya .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 2018
[5]   A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques [J].
Alsharbaty, Mohammed Hussein M. ;
Alikhasi, Marzieh ;
Zarrati, Simindokht ;
Shamshiri, Ahmed Reza .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (04) :E902-E908
[6]   Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study [J].
Amin, Sarah ;
Weber, Hans Peter ;
Finkelman, Matthew ;
El Rafie, Khaled ;
Kudara, Yukio ;
Papaspyridakos, Panos .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) :1360-1367
[7]   Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study [J].
Andriessen, Frank S. ;
Riikens, David R. ;
van der Meer, Wither J. ;
Wismeijer, Daniell W. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (03) :186-194
[8]   Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Cappare, Paolo ;
Sannino, Gianpaolo ;
Minoli, Margherita ;
Montemezzi, Pietro ;
Ferrini, Francesco .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (05)
[9]  
Chochlidakis KM, 2016, J PROSTHET DENT, V116, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
[10]   The CONSORT statement [J].
Cuschieri, Sarah .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 13 :27-30