Decision-making experiences and the need for decision aids in women considering vaginal birth after cesarean: A qualitative meta-synthesis

被引:0
作者
Zhou, Shurong [1 ]
Li, Mengyuan [2 ]
Jie, Xiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Nursing, West China Univ Hosp 2,Dept Obstet Nursing, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Childr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Nursing, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2024年 / 51卷 / 01期
关键词
decision aids; decision-making; information need; systematic review; vaginal birth after cesarean; DELIVERY; SECTION; MODE;
D O I
10.1111/birt.12764
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimsThis study aims to comprehensively explore the decision-making requirements of women contemplating vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).Design & MethodsA meta-synthesis approach was employed for this study. Using an integrative methodology, we conducted a systematic assessment of women's experiences and needs related to VBAC decision-making. A comprehensive search was conducted across The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid Medline, SCOPUS, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, and Wan Fang databases to identify pertinent studies between 2000 and 2022. Furthermore, the reference lists of the included studies were thoroughly examined.ResultsFifteen studies were incorporated, from which seven themes emerged: emotional changes, preference for vaginal birth, unmet information needs, influences on decision-making, decision-making autonomy, aligning information provision with decision-support needs, and the requirement for support systems. Two primary syntheses were constructed on the decision-making process and the need for decision-making aids, respectively.ConclusionWomen opting for VBAC experienced emotional shifts during their decision-making process in pregnancy. There remains a need for an enhanced decision-making tool to guide them in their choice. Recommendations for implementation in VBAC decision aids include facilitating women's involvement in decision-making, satisfying their information needs, and delivering appropriate emotional support. This study synthesis the decision-making experience and decision-making aids requirements of women contemplating vaginal birth after cesarean in qualitative study. Seven subthemes emerged as shown in the picture. Women opting for VBAC experienced emotional shifts during their decision-making process in pregnancy. There remains a need for an enhanced decision-making tool to guide them in their choice.image
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Women's decision-making processes and experiences of vaginal birth after caesarean birth: A phenomenological study
    Akgun, Mehtap
    Boz, Ilkay
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06)
  • [2] Women's Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States: An Integrative Review
    Basile Ibrahim, Bridget
    Kennedy, Holly Powell
    Whittemore, Robin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 65 (03) : 349 - 361
  • [3] Bick Debra, 2004, Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, V1, P198, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04060.x
  • [4] Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
    Black, Mairead
    Entwistle, Vikki A.
    Bhattacharya, Siladitya
    Gillies, Katie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (01):
  • [5] Women's decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study
    Chen, Shu-Wen
    Hutchinson, Alison M.
    Nagle, Cate
    Bucknall, Tracey K.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
  • [6] OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section
    Clarke, Mike
    Devane, Declan
    Gross, Mechthild M.
    Morano, Sandra
    Lundgren, Ingela
    Sinclair, Marlene
    Putman, Koen
    Beech, Beverley
    Vehvilainen-Julkunen, Katri
    Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
    Wiseman, Hugh
    Smith, Valerie
    Daly, Deirdre
    Savage, Gerard
    Newell, John
    Simpkin, Andrew
    Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne
    Healy, Patricia
    Nicoletti, Jane
    Lalor, Joan
    Carroll, Margaret
    van Limbeek, Evelien
    Nilsson, Christina
    Stockdale, Janine
    Fobelets, Maaike
    Begley, Cecily
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery and optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care (OptiBIRTH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10612254)
    Clarke, Mike
    Savage, Gerard
    Smith, Valerie
    Daly, Deirdre
    Devane, Declan
    Gross, Mechthild M.
    Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne
    Healy, Patricia
    Morano, Sandra
    Nicoletti, Jane
    Begley, Cecily
    [J]. TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [8] David Sara, 2010, Women Birth, V23, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.07.002
  • [9] No. 382-Trial of Labour After Caesarean
    Dy, Jessica
    DeMeester, Sheri
    Lipworth, Hayley
    Barrett, Jon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2019, 41 (07) : 992 - 1011
  • [10] Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks
    Emmett, C. L.
    Shaw, A. R. G.
    Montgomery, A. A.
    Murphy, D. J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (12) : 1438 - 1445