Evaluation and improvement of angular response for a commercial 2D detector array for patient-specific QA

被引:0
作者
Wang, Sha [1 ]
Zheng, Yuanshui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sino Singapore Guangzhou Knowledge City, Guangzhou Concord Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sino Singapore Guangzhou Knowledge City, Guangzhou Concord Canc Ctr, 9 Ciji Rd, Guangzhou 510555, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2023年 / 24卷 / 09期
关键词
angular response; composite dose verification; IMRT; MatriXX; quality assurance (QA); VMAT; PIXEL IONIZATION-CHAMBER; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; IMRT; VERIFICATION; MATRIXX;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14106
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeMatriXX ionization chamber array has been widely used for the composite dose verification of IMRT/VMAT plans. However, in addition to its dose response dependence on gantry angle, there seems to be an offset between the beam axis and measured dose profile by MatriXX for oblique beam incidence at various gantry angles, leading to unnecessary quality assurance (QA) fails. In this study, we investigated the offset at various setup conditions and how to eliminate or decrease it to improve the accuracy of MatriXX for IMRT/VMAT plan verification with original gantry angles. MethodsWe measured profiles for a narrow beam with MatriXX located at various depths in increments of 0.5 mm from the top to bottom of the sensitive volume of the array detectors and gantry angles from 0 & DEG; to 360 & DEG;. The optimal depth for QA measurement was determined at the depth where the measured profile had minimum offset. ResultsThe measured beam profile offset varies with incident gantry angle, increasing from vertical direction to lateral direction, and could be over 3 cm at vendor-recommended depth for near lateral direction beams. The offset also varies with depth, and the minimum offset (almost 0 for most oblique beams) was found to be at a depth of & SIM;2.5 mm below the vendor suggested depth, which was chosen as the optimal depth for all QA measurements. Using the optimal depth we determined, QA results (3%/2 mm Gamma analysis) were largely improved with an average of 99.4% gamma passing rate (no fails for 95% criteria) for 10 IMRT and VMAT plans with original gantry angles compared to 94.1% using the vendor recommended depth. ConclusionsThe improved accuracy and passing rate for QA measurement performed at the optimal depth with original gantry angles would lead to reduction in unnecessary repeated QA or plan changes due to QA system errors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Dosimetric characterization of a large area pixel-segmented ionization chamber
    Amerio, S
    Boriano, A
    Bourhaleb, F
    Cirio, R
    Donetti, M
    Fidanzio, A
    Garelli, E
    Giordanengo, S
    Madon, E
    Marchetto, F
    Nastasi, U
    Peroni, C
    Piermattei, A
    Freire, CJS
    Sardo, A
    Trevisiol, E
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (02) : 414 - 420
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, MED PHYS, V45
  • [3] Evaluation of a 2D detector array for patient-specific VMAT QA with different setups
    Boggula, Ramesh
    Birkner, Mattias
    Lohr, Frank
    Steil, Volker
    Wenz, Frederik
    Wertz, Hansjoerg
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (22) : 7163 - 7177
  • [4] An intercomparison between film dosimetry and diode matrix for IMRT quality assurance
    Buonamici, F. Banci
    Compagnucci, A.
    Marrazzo, L.
    Russo, S.
    Bucciolini, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) : 1372 - 1379
  • [5] Hybrid plan verification for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using the 2D ionization chamber array I'mRT MatriXX-a feasibility study
    Dobler, Barbara
    Streck, Natalia
    Klein, Elisabeth
    Loeschel, Rainer
    Haertl, Petra
    Koelbl, Oliver
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (02) : N39 - N55
  • [6] Evaluation of MatriXX for IMRT and VMAT dose verifications in peripheral dose regions
    Han, Zhaohui
    Ng, Sook Kien
    Bhagwat, Mandar S.
    Lyatskaya, Yulia
    Zygmanski, Piotr
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (07) : 3704 - 3714
  • [7] Medical Physics Letter Improving patient safety in radiation oncology
    Hendee, William R.
    Herman, Michael G.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (01) : 78 - 82
  • [8] Dosimetric evaluation of a 2D pixel ionization chamber for implementation in clinical routine
    Herzen, J.
    Todorovic, M.
    Cremers, F.
    Platz, V.
    Albers, D.
    Bartels, A.
    Schmidt, R.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (04) : 1197 - 1208
  • [9] IBA Dosimetr, MATRIXXEVOLUTION MAT
  • [10] Quality assurance methodology for Varian RapidArc treatment plans
    Iftimia, Ileana
    Cirino, Eileen T.
    Xiong, Li
    Mower, Herbert W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 11 (04): : 130 - 143