Assessing the Credit Risk of Crypto-Assets Using Daily Range Volatility Models

被引:0
作者
Fantazzini, Dean [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Moscow Sch Econ, Leninskie Gory 1,Bldg 61, Moscow 119992, Russia
[2] Higher Sch Econ, Fac Econ Sci, Moscow 109028, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
daily range; bitcoin; crypto-assets; cryptocurrencies; credit risk; default probability; probability of death; ZPP; cauchit; random forests; DEFAULT PROBABILITY ESTIMATION; PRICE;
D O I
10.3390/info14050254
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we analyzed a dataset of over 2000 crypto-assets to assess their credit risk by computing their probability of death using the daily range. Unlike conventional low-frequency volatility models that only utilize close-to-close prices, the daily range incorporates all the information provided in traditional daily datasets, including the open-high-low-close (OHLC) prices for each asset. We evaluated the accuracy of the probability of death estimated with the daily range against various forecasting models, including credit scoring models, machine learning models, and time-series-based models. Our study considered different definitions of "dead coins" and various forecasting horizons. Our results indicate that credit scoring models and machine learning methods incorporating lagged trading volumes and online searches were the best models for short-term horizons up to 30 days. Conversely, time-series models using the daily range were more appropriate for longer term forecasts, up to one year. Additionally, our analysis revealed that the models using the daily range signaled, far in advance, the weakened credit position of the crypto derivatives trading platform FTX, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States on 11 November 2022.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Aas K., 2006, J. Financ. Econ., V4, P275, DOI DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBJ006
[2]  
Allison I, DIVISIONS SAM BANKMA
[3]   Modeling and forecasting realized volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (02) :579-625
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, P 17 WORKSH EC INF S
[5]   Regime changes in Bitcoin GARCH volatility dynamics [J].
Ardia, David ;
Bluteau, Keven ;
Ruede, Maxime .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 :266-271
[6]   Machine learning models and bankruptcy prediction [J].
Barboza, Flavio ;
Kimura, Herbert ;
Altman, Edward .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 83 :405-417
[7]   A comparison of techniques of estimation in long-memory processes [J].
Bisaglia, L ;
Guegan, D .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 1998, 27 (01) :61-81
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]  
Brier G. W., 1950, MONTHLY WEATHER REV, V78, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1175/15200493, 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078andlt
[10]  
0001:VOFEITandgt