Irreversible electroporation for prostate cancer using PSMA PET-CT

被引:6
作者
Shin, Dongho [1 ]
Yoon, Chang Eil [1 ]
Kwon, Hyeok Jae [1 ]
Park, Yong Hyun [1 ]
Cho, Hyuk Jin [1 ]
Ha, U-syn [1 ]
Hong, Sung-Hoo [1 ]
Park, Sonya Youngju [2 ]
Ha, Seunggyun [2 ]
O, Joo Hyun [2 ]
Yoo, Ie Ryung [2 ]
Park, Chansoo [3 ]
Chi, Dae Yoon [3 ]
Lee, Ji Youl [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Nucl Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] FutureChem Co Ltd, Res Inst Labelling, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Urol, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
关键词
Ablation technique; Electroporation; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; 18F]Florastamin; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; ABLATION; EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.prnil.2022.08.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To demonstrate the clinical usefulness of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computerized tomography (CT) for irreversible electroporation (IRE) in prostate cancer patients. Methods: From January to May 2021, 17 men were diagnosed with localized prostate cancer through preoperative mpMRI and [F-18] fiorastamin PSMA PET-CT imaging, followed by transperineal MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy. The patients underwent IRE focal therapy at the target lesions under general anesthesia. To evaluate the treatment outcome, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were followed up in the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th months, and mpMRI was taken in the 1st and 12th months, followed by MR fusion biopsy in the 12th month post-IRE. Results: The mean age of the patients was 66.1 +/- 9.3 with a median PSA of 7.5 ng/ml. After the treat-ment, PSA nadir was 4.06 +/- 3.4, and 11 (64.7%) achieved decline of PSA more than 50% from the baseline. Rate of negative biopsy for prostate cancer is 88% (15/17) at 12 months MR fusion biopsy after the IRE treatment. Among the relapsed cases, 1 (6.9%) patient recurred at margin of treated area, and 1 (6.9%) patient was from outfield recurrence. When excluding initial four patients, none of the patients had cancer recur. Conclusions: When treating with IRE focal therapy, PSMA-PET CT is a potentially valuable diagnostic approach for localizing prostate cancer; it supports the detection of lesions with conventional mpMRI, enabling to perform the procedure more completely. (c) 2022 Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 45
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Hu, Yipeng
    Carter, Tim
    Arumainayagam, Nimalan
    Lecornet, Emilie
    Freeman, Alex
    Hawkes, David
    Barratt, Dean C.
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02) : 458 - 464
  • [2] Clinical experience with active surveillance protocol using regular magnetic resonance imaging instead of regular repeat biopsy for monitoring: A study at a high-volume center in Korea
    Ahn, Hyun Kyu
    Lee, Kwang Suk
    Koo, Kyo Chul
    Chung, Byung Ha
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 9 (02) : 90 - 95
  • [3] A study of the immunological response to tumor ablation with irreversible Electroporation
    Al-Sakere, B.
    Bernat, C.
    Andr, F.
    Connault, E.
    Opolon, P.
    Davalos, R. V.
    Mir, L. M.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2007, 6 (04) : 301 - 305
  • [4] Effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in comparison with systematic biopsy in our countries with low prevalence of prostate cancer: our first experience after 3 years
    Arafa, Mostafa A.
    Rabah, Danny M.
    Khan, Farruhk K.
    Farhat, Karim H.
    Al-Atawi, Mohamed A.
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 9 (03) : 140 - 144
  • [5] Oncological and Quality-of-life Outcomes Following Focal Irreversible Electroporation as Primary Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer: A Biopsy-monitored Prospective Cohort
    Blazevski, Alexandar
    Scheltema, Matthijs J.
    Yuen, Brian
    Masand, Natasha
    Nguyen, Tuan, V
    Delprado, Warick
    Shnier, Ron
    Haynes, Anne-Maree
    Cusick, Thomas
    Thompson, James
    Stricker, Phillip
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (03): : 283 - 290
  • [6] Irreversible Electroporation of the Pancreas: Definitive Local Therapy Without Systemic Effects
    Bower, Matthew
    Sherwood, Leslie
    Li, Yan
    Martin, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 104 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [7] The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in patients with biopsy-naive men according to PSA levels: A propensity score matching analysis
    Byun, Hye J.
    Shin, Teak J.
    Jung, Wonho
    Ha, Ji Y.
    Kim, Byung H.
    Kim, Young H.
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 10 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [8] Image-guided Irreversible Electroporation of Localized Prostate Cancer: Functional and Oncologic Outcomes
    Collettini, Federico
    Enders, Judith
    Stephan, Carsten
    Fischer, Thomas
    Baur, Alexander D. J.
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Busch, Jonas
    Hamm, Bernd
    Gebauer, Bernhard
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (01) : 250 - 257
  • [9] Renal Tissue Ablation With Irreversible Electroporation: Preliminary Results in a Porcine Model
    Deodhar, Ajita
    Monette, Sebastien
    Single, Gordon W.
    Hamilton, William C., Jr.
    Thornton, Raymond
    Maybody, Majid
    Coleman, Jonathan A.
    Solomon, Stephen B.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (03) : 754 - 760
  • [10] A systematic review of outcomes after thermal and nonthermal partial prostate ablation
    Fainberg, Jonathan S.
    Al Awamlh, Bashir Al Hussein
    DeRosa, Antonio Primo
    Chesnut, Gregory T.
    Coleman, Jonathan A.
    Lee, Taehyoung
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 9 (04) : 169 - 175