Effective doses and risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations for male and female patients from childhood to old age

被引:14
作者
Harrison, John D. [1 ,2 ]
Haylock, Richard G. E. [2 ]
Jansen, Jan T. M. [2 ]
Zhang, Wei [2 ]
Wakeford, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[2] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, Radiat Chem & Environm Hazards, Didcot OX11 0RQ, Oxon, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Occupat & Environm Hlth, Oxford Rd, Manchester, England
关键词
effective dose; stochastic risks; cancer; medical diagnostic exposures; modifying factors; ATOMIC-BOMB SURVIVORS; NUCLEAR-MEDICINE; CANCER INCIDENCE; ADULT; CT; EXPOSURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6498/acbda7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The consideration of risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations and their justification commonly relies on estimates of effective dose, although the quantity is actually a health-detriment-weighted summation of organ/tissue-absorbed doses rather than a measure of risk. In its 2007 Recommendations, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) defines effective dose in relation to a nominal value of stochastic detriment following low-level exposure of 5.7 x 10(-2) Sv(-1), as an average over both sexes, all ages, and two fixed composite populations (Asian and Euro-American). Effective dose represents the overall (whole-body) dose received by a person from a particular exposure, which can be used for the purposes of radiological protection as set out by ICRP, but it does not provide a measure that is specific to the characteristics of the exposed individual. However, the cancer incidence risk models used by ICRP can be used to provide estimates of risk separately for males and females, as a function of age-at-exposure, and for the two composite populations. Here, these organ/tissue-specific risk models are applied to estimates of organ/tissue-specific absorbed doses from a range of diagnostic procedures to derive lifetime excess cancer incidence risk estimates; the degree of heterogeneity in the distribution of absorbed doses between organs/tissues will depend on the procedure. Depending on the organs/tissues exposed, risks are generally higher in females and notably higher for younger ages-at-exposure. Comparing lifetime cancer incidence risks per Sv effective dose from the different procedures shows that overall risks are higher by about a factor of two to three for the youngest age-at-exposure group, 0-9 yr, than for 30-39 yr adults, and lower by a similar factor for an age-at-exposure of 60-69 yr. Taking into account these differences in risk per Sv, and noting the substantial uncertainties associated with risk estimates, effective dose as currently formulated provides a reasonable basis for assessing the potential risks from medical diagnostic examinations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [11] Radiation detriment calculation methodology: summary of ICRP Publication 152 (vol 42, 023001, 2022)
    Ban, Nobuhiko
    Clero, Enora
    Vaillant, Ludovic
    Zhang, Wei
    Hamada, Nobuyuki
    Preston, Dale
    Laurier, Dominique
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2022, 42 (03)
  • [12] Radiation detriment calculation methodology: summary of ICRP Publication 152
    Ban, Nobuhiko
    Clero, Enora
    Vaillant, Ludovic
    Zhang, Wei
    Hamada, Nobuyuki
    Preston, Dale
    Laurier, Dominique
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2022, 42 (02)
  • [13] Adult Gamma Camera Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Administered Activities Derived From ACR Accreditation Data
    Becker, Murray D.
    Butler, Priscilla F.
    Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi
    Harkness, Beth A.
    Metter, Darlene
    MacFarlane, Carolyn Richards
    Ghesani, Munir
    Wilcox, Pamela
    Oates, M. Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (06) : 688 - 695
  • [14] Bolch W E, 2020, Ann ICRP, V49, P5, DOI 10.1177/0146645320915031
  • [15] Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: call for action
    Brambilla, Marco
    Vassileva, Jenia
    Kuchcinska, Agnieszka
    Rehani, Madan M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (05) : 2493 - 2501
  • [16] Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced
    Brenner, D. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 81 (967) : 521 - 523
  • [17] Brenner D. J., 2012, Annals of the ICRP, V41, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.07.001
  • [18] Lung, Laryngeal and Other Respiratory Cancer Incidence among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors: An Updated Analysis from 1958 through 2009
    Cahoon, Elizabeth K.
    Preston, Dale L.
    Pierce, Donald A.
    Grant, Eric
    Brenner, Alina V.
    Mabuchi, Kiyohiko
    Utada, Mai
    Ozasa, Kotaro
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, 2017, 187 (05) : 538 - 548
  • [19] PATIENT DOSES IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS IN TWO REGIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    Chipiga, L.
    Bernhardsson, C.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2016, 169 (1-4) : 240 - 244
  • [20] Keeping the ICRP recommendations fit for purpose
    Clement, C.
    Ruhm, W.
    Harrison, J.
    Applegate, K.
    Cool, D.
    Larsson, C-M
    Cousins, C.
    Lochard, J.
    Bouffler, S.
    Cho, K.
    Kai, M.
    Laurier, D.
    Liu, S.
    Romanov, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2021, 41 (04) : 1390 - 1409