Effective doses and risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations for male and female patients from childhood to old age

被引:14
作者
Harrison, John D. [1 ,2 ]
Haylock, Richard G. E. [2 ]
Jansen, Jan T. M. [2 ]
Zhang, Wei [2 ]
Wakeford, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[2] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, Radiat Chem & Environm Hazards, Didcot OX11 0RQ, Oxon, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Occupat & Environm Hlth, Oxford Rd, Manchester, England
关键词
effective dose; stochastic risks; cancer; medical diagnostic exposures; modifying factors; ATOMIC-BOMB SURVIVORS; NUCLEAR-MEDICINE; CANCER INCIDENCE; ADULT; CT; EXPOSURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6498/acbda7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The consideration of risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations and their justification commonly relies on estimates of effective dose, although the quantity is actually a health-detriment-weighted summation of organ/tissue-absorbed doses rather than a measure of risk. In its 2007 Recommendations, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) defines effective dose in relation to a nominal value of stochastic detriment following low-level exposure of 5.7 x 10(-2) Sv(-1), as an average over both sexes, all ages, and two fixed composite populations (Asian and Euro-American). Effective dose represents the overall (whole-body) dose received by a person from a particular exposure, which can be used for the purposes of radiological protection as set out by ICRP, but it does not provide a measure that is specific to the characteristics of the exposed individual. However, the cancer incidence risk models used by ICRP can be used to provide estimates of risk separately for males and females, as a function of age-at-exposure, and for the two composite populations. Here, these organ/tissue-specific risk models are applied to estimates of organ/tissue-specific absorbed doses from a range of diagnostic procedures to derive lifetime excess cancer incidence risk estimates; the degree of heterogeneity in the distribution of absorbed doses between organs/tissues will depend on the procedure. Depending on the organs/tissues exposed, risks are generally higher in females and notably higher for younger ages-at-exposure. Comparing lifetime cancer incidence risks per Sv effective dose from the different procedures shows that overall risks are higher by about a factor of two to three for the youngest age-at-exposure group, 0-9 yr, than for 30-39 yr adults, and lower by a similar factor for an age-at-exposure of 60-69 yr. Taking into account these differences in risk per Sv, and noting the substantial uncertainties associated with risk estimates, effective dose as currently formulated provides a reasonable basis for assessing the potential risks from medical diagnostic examinations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Role of Reference Levels in Nuclear Medicine: A Report of the SNMMI Dose Optimization Task Force
    Alessio, Adam M.
    Farrell, Mary Beth
    Fahey, Frederic H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (12) : 1960 - 1964
  • [2] Lifetime attributable risk as an alternative to effective dose to describe the risk of cancer for patients in diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine
    Andersson, Martin
    Eckerman, Keith
    Mattsson, Soren
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (24) : 9177 - 9188
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. BEIR VII Phase 2
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, EPA RAD CANC RISK MO
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, V103, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ICRP.2007.10.003
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation - UNSCEAR 2006 Report, Volume I - Report to the General Assembly
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1991, Annals of the ICRP, V21
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2000, Report to the General Assembly, VII
  • [9] ARSAC, 2020, NOT GUID CLIN ADM RA
  • [10] Patient doses from medical examinations in Russia: 2009-2015
    Balonov, M.
    Golikov, V.
    Zvonova, I.
    Chipiga, L.
    Kalnitsky, S.
    Sarycheva, S.
    Vodovatov, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2018, 38 (01) : 121 - 139