Integration of a circular economy metric with life cycle assessment: methodological proposal of compared agri-food products

被引:7
|
作者
Gallo, Federico [1 ]
Manzardo, Alessandro [1 ]
Camana, Daniela [1 ]
Fedele, Andrea [1 ]
Scipioni, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Qual & Environm Res Ctr, Dept Ind Engn, CESQA, Via Marzolo 9, I-35131 Padua, Italy
来源
关键词
Circular economy; Material Circularity Indicator; MCI; Life Cycle Assessment; LCA; Environmental sustainability; Environmental Product Declaration; EPD; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; GERMANY;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-022-02130-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Based on the Material Circularity Indicator (MCI) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as effective circular and environmental measurement tools, respectively, the purpose of this article is firstly to propose an approach in which to apply the mentioned tools to correlate circularity with environmental impacts. Secondly, it is to test and analyze the model through compared case studies and assess its applicability as an effective product circularity-environmental assessment tool. Methods To propose a methodology that correlates circularity and environmental impacts, the methodologies underlying MCI and LCA were considered the most recognized in the literature. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation suggestion to use complementary indicators (calculated using the LCA methodology) together with the MCI was received to obtain an in-depth analysis of the circular and environmental performance of the products. As a result, an integrated MCI-LCA methodological integration model was proposed in which compared case studies were selected in the agri-food sector since their products encompass both biological and technical materials. Results and discussion From the examination of the graphical representation patterns of the interpretation of results phase, five scenarios for the circular-environmental assessment of compared products were detected depending on the characteristics of the trend line: scenarios no. 1 and 2 where circularity led to higher environmental impacts, scenario no. 3 where circularity did not affect environmental impacts, and scenarios no. 4 and 5 where circularity led to lower environmental impacts. Compared to studies in the current literature, the added value of the application of the proposed model was to allow a comprehensive and holistic assessment through an innovative circular and environmental assessment panel of coupled products belonging to the same product category. Conclusions What the authors expected from the principles of the proposed model and the results achieved make the model applicable. Environmental Product Declarations of coupled products were used as an information source for both circular and environmental evaluations. Circularity did not always lead to a reduction of environmental impact, as it depended on the type of impact category and product. More compared case studies are required to be applied to the proposed integrated model to strengthen the assumption made in the study, determine eventual adjustments in the weighing system of the MCI methodology, and for the detected circular-environmental scenarios to try to bridge the gap of standardized regulations on circularity measurement framework, which have led to the current nonuniform indicator approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1379
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Research priorities for sustainable agri-food systems and life cycle assessment
    Soussana, Jean-Francois
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 73 : 19 - 23
  • [12] A Survey of Life Cycle Assessment Practitioners with a Focus on the Agri-Food Sector
    Teixeira, Ricardo
    Pax, Sara
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 15 (06) : 817 - 820
  • [13] The count of what counts in the agri-food Social Life Cycle Assessment
    Tragnone, Bianca Maria
    D'Eusanio, Manuela
    Petti, Luigia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 354
  • [14] A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability
    Gava, Oriana
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Venturi, Francesca
    Brunori, Gianluca
    Zinnai, Angela
    Pardossi, Alberto
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [15] CETA AND ITALIAN AGRI-FOOD PRODUCTS: AN ANALYSIS ON COMPARED ADVANTAGES OF THE MAIN ITALIAN AGRI-FOOD SECTORS
    Bertolozzi Caredio, Daniele
    Raupeliene, Asta
    8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2017: BIOECONOMY CHALLENGES, 2017, : 1286 - 1291
  • [16] MAPPING SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODS IN AGRI-FOOD SUPPLY CHAINS: A CIRCULAR ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
    Gkountani, Vasiliki A.
    Tsoulfas, Giannis T.
    Mouzakitis, Yannis
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 22 (02) : 361 - 368
  • [17] Methodological proposal for a national innovation survey for the agri-food sector in Cuba
    Santos Lacaba, David
    Ruiz Gonzalez, Maria de los Angeles
    Chia Garzon, Jesus
    Rodriguez Batista, Armando
    Zamora Rodriguez, Maria Luisa
    GECONTEC-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE GESTION DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y LA TECNOLOGIA, 2022, 10 (01): : 78 - 102
  • [18] Value optimisation for the agri-food sector: A circular economy approach
    Poponi, Stefano
    Arcese, Gabriella
    Ruggieri, Alessandro
    Pacchera, Francesco
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (06) : 2850 - 2867
  • [19] Logistics 4.0 toward circular economy in the agri-food sector
    Krstic, Mladen
    Agnusdei, Giulio Paolo
    Miglietta, Pier Paolo
    Tadic, Snezana
    SUSTAINABLE FUTURES, 2022, 4
  • [20] Regulatory Elements on the Circular Economy: Driving into the Agri-Food System
    Zarba, Carla
    Chinnici, Gaetano
    La Via, Giovanni
    Bracco, Salvatore
    Pecorino, Biagio
    D'Amico, Mario
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)