Characteristics and outcomes of new molecular oncology drug approvals, in combination or monotherapy

被引:1
作者
Ranganathan, Sruthi [1 ]
Haslam, Alyson [2 ]
Tuia, Jordan [2 ]
Prasad, Vinay [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 550 16th St,2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[3] Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 550 16th St,2nd Fl,UCSF Mission Bay Campus,Mission, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER POLICY | 2024年 / 39卷
关键词
FDA; Drug approval; Monotherapy; In-combination; NME; RESPONSE RATE; SINGLE-ARM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100462
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Importance: Understanding the factors that are associated with new molecular entity (NME) cancer drug approvals as a single agent and in combination, and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) scores, can aid in identifying suitable factors to consider in trial designs for future drugs. In addition, the association between the various outcomes can aid in determining benefit when surrogate outcomes are used in approval consideration.Objective: This study aims to (1) use the measures used in evaluating clinical trials by ESMO scores to determine the differences in the characteristics of 2013-2022 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oncology NME drug approvals for those approved for use in combination or as a monotherapy, and (2) analyze the association between survival outcomes and the response rate for monotherapy NME drugs and/or drugs approved in combination.Design: Cross-sectional analysis.Setting: US FDA Oncology Drug Approvals (2013-2022)Participants: US FDA Oncology Drug Approvals (2013-2022)Exposures: Trial-level characteristics (tumor types, basis of approval, randomized or not, phase) and associations between overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall response rate (ORR) and whether NME drugs were approved as monotherapy or in combination .Results: Drugs approved for use as a monotherapy are less likely to be approved using a randomized study (p < 0.001) and more likely to be approved via the accelerated pathway (p = 0.012) and be open-label (p < 0.001). Drugs approved for use as a combination or monotherapy significantly differed on their approval basis (p = 0.002), phase of trial at the time of approval (p = 0.02), and ESMO scores (p = 0.02). There was low correlation between response rate and either PFS or OS metrics. However, nearly all of the drugs with large improvements in OS (> 5months) were drugs with robust ORR.Conclusions and relevance: Drugs approved as monotherapy with a low response rate are likely to have marginal benefit in OS and PFS.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate
    Chen, Emerson Y.
    Raghunathan, Vikram
    Prasad, Vinay
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (07) : 915 - 921
  • [2] ESMO, ESMO-MCBS Scorecards
  • [3] Unintended Consequences of Expensive Cancer Therapeutics-The Pursuit of Marginal Indications and a Me-Too Mentality That Stifles Innovation and Creativity The John Conley Lecture
    Fojo, Tito
    Mailankody, Sham
    Lo, Andrew
    [J]. JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2014, 140 (12) : 1225 - 1236
  • [4] Drugs that lack single-agent activity: are they worth pursuing in combination?
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Prasad, Vinay
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 14 (04) : 1 - 2
  • [5] An Appraisal of Clinically Meaningful Outcomes Guidelines for Oncology Clinical Trials
    Kumar, Hemanth
    Fojo, Tito
    Mailankody, Sham
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (09) : 1238 - 1240
  • [6] 2022 FDA approvals
    Mullard, Asher
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2023, 22 (02) : 83 - 88
  • [7] Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia
    O'Brien, SG
    Guilhot, F
    Larson, RA
    Gathmann, I
    Baccarani, M
    Cervantes, F
    Cornelissen, JJ
    Fischer, T
    Hochhaus, A
    Hughes, T
    Lechner, K
    Nielsen, JL
    Rousselot, P
    Reiffers, J
    Saglio, G
    Shepherd, J
    Simonsson, B
    Gratwohl, A
    Goldman, JM
    Kantarjian, H
    Taylor, K
    Verhoef, G
    Bolton, AE
    Capdeville, R
    Druker, BJ
    Durrant, S
    Schwarer, A
    Joske, D
    Seymour, J
    Grigg, A
    Ma, D
    Arthur, C
    Bradstock, K
    Joshua, D
    Louwagie, A
    Martiat, P
    Straetmans, N
    Bosly, A
    Shustik, C
    Lipton, J
    Forrest, D
    Walker, I
    Roy, DC
    Rubinger, M
    Bence-Bruckler, I
    Kovacs, M
    Turner, AR
    Birgens, H
    Bjerrum, O
    Facon, T
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (11) : 994 - 1004
  • [8] Response rate of anticancer drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration based on a single-arm trial
    Oda, Yoshihiro
    Narukawa, Mamoru
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [9] Response Rate as a Regulatory End Point in Single-Arm Studies of Advanced Solid Tumors
    Oxnard, Geoffrey R.
    Wilcox, Katharine H.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Polotsky, Mikhael
    Hirsch, Bradford R.
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (06) : 772 - 779
  • [10] Impact of dexamethasone responsiveness on long term outcome in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
    Sinha, Shirshendu
    Rajkumar, S. Vincent
    Lacy, Martha Q.
    Hayman, Suzanne R.
    Buadi, Francis K.
    Dispenzieri, Angela
    Dingli, David
    Kyle, Robert A.
    Gertz, Morie A.
    Kumar, Shaji
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2010, 148 (06) : 853 - 858