Efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in COVID-19 management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:22
作者
Deng, Jiawen [1 ]
Rayner, Daniel [2 ]
Ramaraju, Harikrishnaa B. [3 ]
Abbas, Umaima [4 ]
Garcia, Cristian [1 ]
Heybati, Kiyan [5 ]
Zhou, Fangwen [6 ]
Huang, Emma [7 ]
Park, Ye-Jean [1 ]
Moskalyk, Myron [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, 1 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Windsor Campus, Windsor, ON, Canada
[5] Mayo Clin, Mayo Clin Rochester, Alix Sch Med, Rochester, MN USA
[6] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
COVID-19; Fluvoxamine; Meta-analysis; SARS-CoV-2; Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; FLUVOXAMINE; GRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmi.2023.01.010
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: The efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of acute COVID-19 is still under investigation, with conflicting results reported from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Different dosing regimens may have contributed to the contradictory findings. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SSRIs and the effect of different dosing regimens on the treatment of acute COVID-19. Data sources: Seven databases were searched from January 2020 to December 2022. Trial registries, previous reviews, and preprint servers were hand-searched. Study eligibility criteria: RCTs and observational studies with no language restrictions. Participants: COVID-19 inpatients/outpatients. Interventions: SSRIs prescribed after diagnosis were compared against a placebo or standard of care. Assessment of risk of bias: Risk of bias was rated using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Ran-domized Trials version 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions. Methods of data synthesis: Outcomes were mortality, hospitalization, composite of hospitalization/ emergency room visits, hypoxemia, requirement for supplemental oxygen, ventilator support, and serious adverse events. RCT data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Observational findings were narratively described. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of SSRI dose, and sensitivity analyses were performed excluding studies with a high risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Six RCTs (N = 4197) and five observational studies (N = 1156) were included. Meta-analyses associated fluvoxamine with reduced mortality (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63-0.82) and hospitalization (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99) on the basis of moderate quality of evidence. Medium-dose fluvoxamine (100 mg twice a day) was associated with reduced mortality, hospitalization, and composite of hospitali-zation/emergency room visits, but low-dose fluvoxamine (50 mg twice a day) was not. Fluvoxamine was not associated with increased serious adverse events. Observational studies support the use of fluvoxamine and highlight fluoxetine as a possible alternative to SSRIs for the treatment of COVID-19. Discussion: Fluvoxamine remains a candidate pharmacotherapy for treating COVID-19 in outpatients. Medium-dose fluvoxamine may be preferable over low-dose fluvoxamine. Jiawen Deng, Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:578 (c) 2023 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Bhimraj A, 2022, IDSA Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19
[2]  
Version 10.2.0
[3]   Meta-analysis of the dose-response relationship of SSRI in obsessive-compulsive disorder [J].
Bloch, M. H. ;
McGuire, J. ;
Landeros-Weisenberger, A. ;
Leckman, J. F. ;
Pittenger, C. .
MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 15 (08) :850-855
[4]   Effectiveness of antidepressants - Meta-analysis of dose-effect relationships in randomised clinical trials [J].
Bollini, P ;
Pampallona, S ;
Tibaldi, G ;
Kupelnick, B ;
Munizza, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 174 :297-303
[5]  
Bramante CT, 2022, NEW ENGL J MED, V387, P599, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2201662
[6]   Safety and efficacy of fluvoxamine in COVID-19 ICU patients: An open label, prospective cohort trial with matched controls [J].
Calusic, Martina ;
Marcec, Robert ;
Luksa, Lea ;
Jurkovic, Ivan ;
Kovac, Natasa ;
Mihaljevic, Slobodan ;
Likic, Robert .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 88 (05) :2065-2073
[7]   Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study [J].
Cheng, Ji ;
Pullenayegum, Eleanor ;
Marshall, John K. ;
Iorio, Alfonso ;
Thabane, Lehana .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (08)
[8]  
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2022, FLUOXETINE REDUCE IN
[9]  
ClinicalTrialsgov, 2022, FLUVOXAMINE EARLY TR
[10]   Fluvoxamine for the Early Treatment of COVID-19: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [J].
Guo, Christina M. ;
Harari, Ofir ;
Chernecki, Cameron ;
Thorlund, Kristian ;
Forrest, Jamie, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2022, 106 (05) :1315-1320