Is Public Engagement in Bioengineering and Synthetic Biology Improving Research Outcomes?

被引:6
作者
Carter, Lucy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mankad, Aditi [1 ,2 ]
Hobman, Elizabeth V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Environm, Brisbane, Australia
[2] CSIRO Adv Engn Biol Future Sci Platform, Brisbane, Australia
[3] CSIRO Environm, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
关键词
public engagement; responsible science; ecology; science integration; bioengineering; synthetic biology;
D O I
10.1089/omi.2022.0181
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Engaging diverse publics on the acceptability of large-scale biology applications such as gene drives is held in high regard by the international research community. The development of gene drives to suppress invasive and pest species and improvements to the sustainability of food systems are examples of integrative biology applications in engineering and ecology with the potential for large-scale research impact. Despite a global collective intention to ensure disruptive technologies are in broad alignment with wider social and public values, evidence of applied research organizations integrating the knowledge acquired from social research is hard to find. Concrete mechanisms to ensure public perspectives affect science decision-making are yet to emerge. We offer avenues for making inroads in what we identify as a remaining gap in public engagement research in the fields of synthetic biology and bioengineering.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 50
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Gene drives on the horizon: advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values, DOI DOI 10.17226/23405
[2]   Whose intentions? What consequences? Interrogating "Intended Consequences" for conservation with environmental biotechnology [J].
Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen ;
Delborne, Jason A. .
CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 3 (04)
[3]   The Promises and Realities of Integration in Synthetic Biology: A View From Social Science [J].
Carter, Lucy ;
Mankad, Aditi .
FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 8
[4]  
de Graeff N, 2022, AJOB Empir Bioeth, V13, P107, DOI 10.1080/23294515.2021.1941417
[5]  
Frodeman R, 2020, ISSUES SCI TECHNOL, V36, P28
[6]  
Gray P, 2018, Synthetic biology in Australia: An outlook to 2030
[7]   Societal impact of synthetic biology: responsible research and innovation (RRI) [J].
Gregorowius, Daniel ;
Deplazes-Zemp, Anna .
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY-BOOK, 2016, 60 (04) :371-379
[8]   Is there convergence in convergence research? An overview of empirical studies on policy convergence [J].
Heichel, S ;
Pape, J ;
Sommerer, T .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2005, 12 (05) :817-840
[9]   From Precaution to Peril: Public Relations Across Forty Years of Genetic Engineering [J].
Hogan, Andrew J. .
ENDEAVOUR, 2016, 40 (04) :218-222
[10]   Reflecting on public engagement and science policy [J].
Jones, Richard A. L. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (01) :27-31