Prevalence and Severity of Aortic Regurgitation Due to a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella 5.0): A Retrospective Observational Study

被引:3
|
作者
Hotta, Naoshi [1 ]
Tsukinaga, Akito [1 ,3 ]
Yoshitani, Kenji [1 ]
Fukushima, Satsuki [2 ]
Ohnishi, Yoshihiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[2] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Cardiac Surg, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[3] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, 6-1 Kishibeshimmachi, Suita, Osaka 5648565, Japan
关键词
Impella; percutaneous left ventricular assist device; aortic regurgitation; CARDIAC-OUTPUT; THERMODILUTION METHOD; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; SUPPORT; INSUFFICIENCY; AXILLARY;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2022.10.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: Placement of the Impella 5.0 percutaneous left ventricular assist device may cause aortic regurgitation (AR) due to malcoaptation of the aortic leaflets. The authors investigated the prevalence and severity of AR during Impella 5.0 support.Design: Retrospective observational study.Setting: An academic hospital. Participants: A total of forty-two consecutive patients who underwent Impella 5.0 implantation from April 2018 to March 2022.Interventions: None.Measurements and Main Results: To investigate AR prevalence, the authors calculated the AR volume by subtracting left ventricular inflow from left-sided systemic flow, the latter of which consisted of flow through the Impella 5.0 cannula and across the aortic valve. Because it is chal-lenging to estimate flow across the aortic valve as distinct from that through Impella 5.0, the authors analyzed 19 of 42 patients whose aortic valves were closed (ie, those with no spontaneous cardiac output). AR due to Impella 5.0 was considered present if the AR fraction was >7%. The median AR volume was 0.6 L/min (interquartile range: 0.4-1.5 L/min), which was 13.5% (interquartile range: 11.0 to 30.6%) of the median Impella 5.0 flow. Seventeen of the 19 patients (89.5%) were diagnosed with AR during Impella 5.0 support, and the severity of AR was mild in 11 patients (57.9%) and moderate in 6 (31.6%).Conclusions: The authors revealed a high prevalence of AR during Impella 5.0 support in patients with no spontaneous cardiac output. More-over, 31.6% of patients had moderate AR.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 30
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictors of 30-day mortality and outcomes in patients who receive percutaneous left-ventricular support with an Impella assist device
    Sharma, Divyesh
    Gauthier, Stephen
    Dzavik, Vladimr
    Overgaard, Christopher B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (15) : B78 - B78
  • [42] Mitral regurgitation severity at left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with distinct myocardial transcriptomic signatures
    Duggal, Neal M.
    Lei, Ienglam
    Wu, Xiaoting
    Aaronson, Keith D.
    Pagani, Francis D.
    Lam, Hugo Y. -K.
    Tang, Paul C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 166 (01) : 141 - 152.e1
  • [43] Direct aortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation for pure aortic valve regurgitation after implantation of a left ventricular assist device
    Krause, Rene
    Metz, Dietrich
    Bushnaq, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 147 (04) : E38 - E41
  • [44] Ventricular Energetics in Pediatric Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Retrospective Clinical Study
    Di Molfetta, Arianna
    Ferrari, Gianfranco
    Iacobelli, Roberta
    Filippelli, Sergio
    Di Chiara, Luca
    Guccione, Paolo
    Amodeo, Antonio
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2017, 63 (06) : 815 - 823
  • [45] Natural history and clinical effect of aortic valve regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Rajagopal, Keshava
    Daneshmand, Mani A.
    Patel, Chetan B.
    Ganapathi, Asvin M.
    Schechter, Matthew A.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    Milano, Carmelo A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (05) : 1373 - 1379
  • [46] TAVI With ACURATE neo2 Valve in Aortic Regurgitation Due to Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Custom-Made Option
    Pardo Sanz, Ana
    Tahoces, Luisa Salido
    Bravo, Marta Jimenez-Blanco
    Garcia, Jesus Alvarez
    Gomez, Jose Luis Zamorano
    Recalde, Angel Sanchez
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2024, 17 (02) : 181 - 183
  • [47] De Novo Aortic Regurgitation After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Patil, Nikhil Prakash
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Mohite, Prashant N.
    Garcia, Diana
    Weymann, Alexander
    Zych, Bartlomiej
    Bowles, Christopher T.
    Hards, Rachel
    Hedger, Michael
    Popov, Aron F.
    De Robertis, Fabio
    Moza, Ajay
    Bahrami, Toufan
    Amrani, Mohamed
    Rahman-Haley, Shelley
    Banner, Nicholas R.
    Simon, Andre Ruediger
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 98 (03) : 850 - 857
  • [48] Mechanical Circulatory Support With Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Recovery in Takotsubo Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction
    Beneduce, Alessandro
    Bertoldi, Letizia Fausta
    Melillo, Francesco
    Baldetti, Luca
    Spoladore, Roberto
    Slavich, Massimo
    Oppizzi, Michele
    Margonato, Alberto
    Pappalardo, Federico
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (04) : E30 - E31
  • [49] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Aortic Regurgitation-Single Institution Retrospective Analysis
    Danley, Matthew R.
    Lensing, Christopher
    Eagle, Susan S.
    Kingeter, Meredith A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (08) : 2839 - 2840
  • [50] A case of cardiogenic shock due to acute coronary syndrome successfully recovered by percutaneous and paracorporeal left ventricular assist device
    Makiko Nakamura
    Masakazu Hori
    Masaki Nakagaito
    Hiroyuki Kuwahara
    Osamu Kinoshita
    Minoru Ono
    Shigeki Yokoyama
    Toshio Doi
    Kazuaki Fukahara
    Koichiro Kinugawa
    Journal of Artificial Organs, 2019, 22 : 249 - 252