The effects of a metacognitive intervention on lower-proficiency EFL learners' listening comprehension and listening self-efficacy

被引:37
作者
Milliner, Brett [1 ]
Dimoski, Blagoja [1 ]
机构
[1] Tamagawa Univ, Machida, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
ELF; listening comprehension; listening pedagogy; listening self-efficacy; listening strategies; metacognitive intervention; LINGUA FRANCA; L2; LEARNERS; BOTTOM-UP; INSTRUCTION; VOCABULARY; AWARENESS; ENGLISH; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1177/13621688211004646
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Focusing on the teaching of listening strategies to second language (L2) learners, this study sought to revisit Renandya and Farrell's (2011) claims that explicit listening strategy instruction for lower-proficiency learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) is a fruitless endeavor. As such, we implemented a quasi-experimental study to measure the effectiveness of a metacognitive intervention for a convenience sample of lower-proficiency (CEFR A2) Japanese university EFL learners (n = 129). The training program focused on an explicit process-based approach, involving integrated experiential learning tasks and guided reflections, to develop learners' L2 listening skills. Data collection consisted of TOEIC (R) test scores, listening comprehension tests, cloze tests, a listening self-efficacy questionnaire, and a post-treatment survey. While the training program was received favorably by students, and students displayed a slightly more confident stance towards listening in their L2, we were unable to find any strong empirical evidence that our lower-proficiency EFL learners' listening performance improved. As such, these results provide evidence of a potential proficiency threshold for EFL learners to start to benefit from a strategy-focused metacognitive intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 713
页数:35
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Bandura A., 1999, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[2]   An analysis of polyadic English as a lingua franca (ELF) speech: A communicative strategies framework [J].
Bjorkman, Beyza .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2014, 66 :122-138
[3]  
Buck G., 2001, Assessing Listening
[4]  
Burns A., 2010, Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners
[5]  
Canagarajah S., 2006, Language Assessment Quarterly, V3, P229, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15434311LAQ0303_1, 10.1207/s15434311laq0303_1]
[6]  
Chang C-S., 2012, Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, V14, P25, DOI DOI 10.1177/0033688216631175
[7]  
Chapman M., 2008, Shiken: JALT Testing and Evaluation SIG Newsletter, V12, P32
[8]  
Chen A.H., 2009, Asian EFL Journal, V11, P54, DOI DOI 10.6425/JNHUST.201309_31(3
[9]  
Childs M., 1995, LANGUAGE TESTING JAP, P66
[10]  
Cross J., 2012, ELT World Online, V4, P1