Accuracy of maxillary full-arch digital impressions of tooth and implant models made by two intraoral scanners

被引:1
作者
Siadat, Hakimeh [1 ]
Chitsaz, Foujan [2 ]
Zeighami, Somayeh [1 ,4 ]
Esmaeilzadeh, Alireza [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dent Res Inst, Dept Prosthodont, Sch Dent, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Arak Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont, Arak, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dent Res Inst, Dept Prosthodont, Tehran, Iran
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH | 2024年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
dental implants; dental impression technique; dimensional measurement accuracy; IN-VIVO PRECISION; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; SCANNING SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY; VITRO; TRUENESS; LIGHT; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.857
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Limited studies are available on the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for full-arch implant and tooth models. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of maxillary full-arch digital impressions of tooth and implant models made by two IOSs. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on two maxillary dentiform models: one with six prepared natural teeth and the other with six implants at the site of canine, first premolar, and first molar teeth, bilaterally. A highly accurate industrial scanner was used for actual measurements on the models that served as the reference scan. TS (Trios3) and CO (CEREC Omnicam) IOSs were then used to scan each model 10 times according to the manufacturer's instructions. All scans were saved in STL format. The GOM Inspect software was used according to the best-fit algorithm to compare the accuracy of measurements in the groups with the reference scan. The trueness and precision were calculated. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS by one-way analysis of variance and t-test (alpha = .05). Results: TS showed a significantly higher trueness than CO for both tooth and implant models (p < .05). TS also revealed significantly higher precision than CO for the tooth model; however, the difference in precision for the implant model was not significant between the two IOSs (p > .05). Conclusions: TS showed higher accuracy than CO in both tooth and implant models.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    Sallorenzo, Alessandro
    Ortega, Rocio
    Gomez-Polo, Cristina
    Barmak, Abdul B.
    Att, Wael
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [22] Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
    Imburgia, Mario
    Logozzo, Silvia
    Hauschild, Uli
    Veronesi, Giovanni
    Mangano, Carlo
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2017, 17
  • [23] Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device
    Iturrate, Mikel
    Eguiraun, Harkaitz
    Etxaniz, Olatz
    Solaberrieta, Eneko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (03) : 447 - 454
  • [24] JEMT T, 1991, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V6, P270
  • [25] Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns
    Joda, Tim
    Braegger, Urs
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (11) : 1304 - 1306
  • [26] Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark
    Kim, Jong-Eun
    Amelya, Ami
    Shin, Yooseok
    Shim, June-Sung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 117 (06) : 755 - 761
  • [27] A clinical comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques regarding finish line locations and impression time
    Koulivand, Soudabeh
    Ghodsi, Safoura
    Siadat, Hakimeh
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 32 (02) : 236 - 243
  • [28] Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions
    Lee, Sang J.
    Betensky, Rebecca A.
    Gianneschi, Grace E.
    Gallucci, German O.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (06) : 715 - 719
  • [29] Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes
    Lee, Sang J.
    Gallucci, German O.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (01) : 111 - 115
  • [30] Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    Hauschild, Uli
    Veronesi, Giovanni
    Imburgia, Mario
    Mangano, Carlo
    Admakin, Oleg
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)