Accuracy of maxillary full-arch digital impressions of tooth and implant models made by two intraoral scanners

被引:1
作者
Siadat, Hakimeh [1 ]
Chitsaz, Foujan [2 ]
Zeighami, Somayeh [1 ,4 ]
Esmaeilzadeh, Alireza [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dent Res Inst, Dept Prosthodont, Sch Dent, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Arak Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont, Arak, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dent Res Inst, Dept Prosthodont, Tehran, Iran
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH | 2024年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
dental implants; dental impression technique; dimensional measurement accuracy; IN-VIVO PRECISION; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; SCANNING SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY; VITRO; TRUENESS; LIGHT; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.857
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Limited studies are available on the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for full-arch implant and tooth models. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of maxillary full-arch digital impressions of tooth and implant models made by two IOSs. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on two maxillary dentiform models: one with six prepared natural teeth and the other with six implants at the site of canine, first premolar, and first molar teeth, bilaterally. A highly accurate industrial scanner was used for actual measurements on the models that served as the reference scan. TS (Trios3) and CO (CEREC Omnicam) IOSs were then used to scan each model 10 times according to the manufacturer's instructions. All scans were saved in STL format. The GOM Inspect software was used according to the best-fit algorithm to compare the accuracy of measurements in the groups with the reference scan. The trueness and precision were calculated. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS by one-way analysis of variance and t-test (alpha = .05). Results: TS showed a significantly higher trueness than CO for both tooth and implant models (p < .05). TS also revealed significantly higher precision than CO for the tooth model; however, the difference in precision for the implant model was not significant between the two IOSs (p > .05). Conclusions: TS showed higher accuracy than CO in both tooth and implant models.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The Influence of Digital Fabrication Options on the Accuracy of Dental Implant-Based Single Units and Complete-Arch Frameworks
    Abdel-Azim, Tamer
    Zandinejad, Amirali
    Elathamna, Eiad
    Lin, Weishao
    Morton, Dean
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (06) : 1281 - 1288
  • [2] ADELL R, 1985, INT DENT J, V35, P259
  • [3] Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
    Amin, Sarah
    Weber, Hans Peter
    Finkelman, Matthew
    El Rafie, Khaled
    Kudara, Yukio
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) : 1360 - 1367
  • [4] Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study
    Andriessen, Frank S.
    Riikens, David R.
    van der Meer, Wither J.
    Wismeijer, Daniell W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (03) : 186 - 194
  • [5] In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral scans
    Baghani, Mohammad Taghi
    Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin
    Johnston, William M.
    Shidfar, Shireen
    Hakimaneh, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (05) : 665 - 670
  • [6] In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses
    Bilmenoglu, Caglar
    Cilingir, Altug
    Geckili, Onur
    Bilhan, Hakan
    Bilgin, Tayfun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (06) : 755 - 760
  • [7] Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients
    Boeddinghaus, Moritz
    Breloer, Eva Sabina
    Rehmann, Peter
    Woestmann, Bernd
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 19 (08) : 2027 - 2034
  • [8] OSSEOINTEGRATION AND ITS EXPERIMENTAL BACKGROUND
    BRANEMARK, PI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 50 (03) : 399 - 410
  • [9] Chochlidakis KM, 2016, J PROSTHET DENT, V116, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
  • [10] Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners
    Di Fiore, Adolfo
    Meneghello, Roberto
    Graiff, Lorenzo
    Savio, Gianpaolo
    Vigolo, Paolo
    Monaco, Carlo
    Stellini, Edoardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (04) : 396 - 403