Performance and returns volatility of banks in India: public versus private sector

被引:1
作者
Singh, Kuldeep [1 ]
机构
[1] Symbiosis Int Deemed Univ, Symbiosis Inst Business Management, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Bank performance; Capital adequacy; Credit risk; India; COVID-19; COMMERCIAL-BANKS; PROFITABILITY; DETERMINANTS; EARNINGS; LEVEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1108/JEAS-07-2023-0181
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThis current study draws a comparison between the performance indicators of public sector banks (PSBs) and private sector banks (or non-PSBs) in India. The study controls for the impact of COVID-19.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses strongly balanced panel data for seven years of 12 PSBs and 10 non-PSBs from the Nifty PSU Bank Index and Nifty Private Bank Index. The study applies panel data methodology to arrive at the results.FindingsThe study demonstrates that the behavior of indicators of performance and returns volatility for PSBs and non-PSBs differs substantially. While factors like capital adequacy ratio (CAR), cost management (COST), liquidity (LIQ), inflation and economic growth exhibit a similar impact on both categories of Indian banks, the effect of credit risk (RISK), market power (POWER) and COVID-19 on performance and returns stability is different for PSBs and non-PSBs.Research limitations/implicationsThere is a limited sample size of banks in India.Practical implicationsPSBs and non-PSBs need distinct treatments when calibrating performance indicators.Social implicationsThe performance and stability of banks are essential for society at large, the depositors and the investors.Originality/valueThe study provides vibrant implications for insight for banks to calibrate the variables that determine performance and stability, regulators and policymakers for effective governance of the banking ecosystem and effective utilization of public funds and capital. The findings are relevant for policymaking today, when the government is considering the privatization of a few PSBs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Determinants of bank profitability before, during, and after the financial crisis [J].
Adelopo, Ismail ;
Lloydking, Robert ;
Tauringana, Venancio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2018, 14 (04) :378-398
[2]   Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis [J].
Aebi, Vincent ;
Sabato, Gabriele ;
Schmid, Markus .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2012, 36 (12) :3213-3226
[3]  
Ahokpossi C, 2013, IMF Working Paper WP/13/34
[4]  
Akter R., 2017, International Journal of Economics and Finance, V9, P126, DOI [10.5539/ijef.v9n3p126, DOI 10.5539/IJEF.V9N3P126]
[5]   Nonlinear linkages between bank asset quality and profitability: evidence from dynamic and quantile approaches using a global sample [J].
Alqahtani, Faisal ;
Hamdi, Besma ;
Skully, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2022, 18 (03) :425-444
[6]   Why Do African Banks Lend So Little? [J].
Andrianova, Svetlana ;
Baltagi, Badi ;
Demetriades, Panicos ;
Fielding, David .
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2015, 77 (03) :339-359
[7]   What drives the performance of different bank-ownership types in Indonesia? The pre- and post-GFC analysis [J].
Atahau, Apriani Dorkas Rambu ;
Cronje, Tom .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 71 (08) :3309-3330
[8]  
Athanasoglou P.P., 2008, J INT FINANC MARK I, V18, P121, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.INTFIN.2006.07.001
[9]   Bank procyclicality and output: Issues and policies [J].
Athanasoglou, Panayiotis P. ;
Daniilidis, Ioannis ;
Delis, Manthos D. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2014, 72 :58-83
[10]  
Baltagi BH, 2015, The Oxford handbook of panel data