Maintenance strategies after anti-EGFR-based induction in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Mastrantoni, Luca [1 ,3 ]
Beccia, Viria [1 ]
Caira, Giulia [1 ]
Trovato, Giovanni [1 ]
Calegari, Maria Alessandra [2 ]
Basso, Michele [2 ]
Salvatore, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Pozzo, Carmelo [2 ]
Tortora, Giampaolo [1 ,2 ]
Bria, Emilio [1 ,2 ]
Orlandi, Armando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Med Oncol, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Med Oncol Dept, Via Pineta Sacchetti 217, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Maintenance therapy; Anti-EGFR; Cetuximab; Panitumumab; Meta-analysis; FOLFIRI PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; EARLY TUMOR SHRINKAGE; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; OPEN-LABEL; RAS; CETUXIMAB; CHEMOTHERAPY; INTERMITTENT; MULTICENTER; PANITUMUMAB;
D O I
10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104106
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In RAS wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) maintenance therapy after induction with fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based cytotoxic therapy (CT) plus anti-EGFR agents is controversial.Methods: Phase II-III randomized trials were included. Maintenance strategies considered were: observation, antiEGFR or FP monotherapy, FP + anti-EGFR, doublet CT + anti-EGFR.Results: Maintenance with FP + anti-EGFR (HR 0.56, 95% CrI 0.36-0.89) showed the greatest PFS benefit compared to observation, ranking first on SUCRA analysis (96.4%). Considering OS, doublet CT+ anti-EGFR, FP + anti-EGFR and anti-EGFR monotherapy yielded similar results. For PFS, FP + anti-EGFR confirmed to be valuable in BRAF wt patients and left sided tumors. In left sided tumors, the OS benefit of adding CT was limited. FP plus anti-EGFR showed a favourable safety profile compared to doublet CT + anti-EGFR. Conclusions: FP + anti-EGFR can be considered a valuable maintenance option in RAS wt mCRC. EGFR monotherapy can be considered, especially in left-sided tumors.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[31]   Incidence and management of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous and metachronous colorectal metastases: a population-based study [J].
Vayrynen, V. ;
Wirta, E. -V. ;
Seppala, T. ;
Sihvo, E. ;
Mecklin, J. -P. ;
Vasala, K. ;
Kellokumpu, I. .
BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (04) :685-692
[32]   Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years [J].
Vuik, Fanny E. R. ;
Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V. ;
Bardou, Marc ;
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris ;
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario ;
Bento, Maria J. ;
Zadnik, Vesna ;
Pellise, Maria ;
Esteban, Laura ;
Kaminski, Michal F. ;
Suchanek, Stepan ;
Ngo, Ondrej ;
Majek, Ondrej ;
Leja, Marcis ;
Kuipers, Ernst J. ;
Spaander, Manon C. W. .
GUT, 2019, 68 (10) :1820-1826
[33]   Effect of Reduced-Dose Capecitabine Plus Cetuximab as Maintenance Therapy for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer A Phase 2 Clinical Trial [J].
Wang, Lu ;
Liu, Ying ;
Yin, Xianli ;
Fang, Weijia ;
Xiong, Jianping ;
Zhao, Ben ;
Zhang, Mingsheng ;
Zou, Yanmei ;
Qiu, Hong ;
Yuan, Xianglin .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (07)
[34]   Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial [J].
Wasan, Harpreet ;
Meade, Angela M. ;
Adams, Richard ;
Wilson, Richard ;
Pugh, Cheryl ;
Fisher, David ;
Sydes, Benjamin ;
Madi, Ayman ;
Sizer, Bruce ;
Lowdell, Charles ;
Middleton, Gary ;
Butler, Rachel ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Maughan, Tim .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (06) :631-639
[35]  
Yoshino T, 2022, J CLIN ONCOL, V40